International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (1):55-63 (2007)
|Abstract||In a recent paper Carol Hay has argued for the conclusion that “a woman who has been sexually harassed has a moral obligation to confront her harasser.” I will argue in this paper that Hay’s arguments for her conclusion are unsound, for they rest on both a misconstrual of the nature of personal autonomy, and a misunderstanding of its relationship to moral responsibility. However, even though Hay’s own arguments do not support her conclusion that women have a duty to resist sexual harassment this conclusion can draw support from arguments that are independent of hers. Women, then, do indeed have a moral obligation to confront those who sexually harass them|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Linda Lemoncheck (1998). Loose Women, Lecherous Men: A Feminist Philosophy of Sex. Philosophical Studies 89 (2-3):369-373.
Stephen Darwall (2010). Moral Obligation: Form and Substance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (1):31-46.
Carol Hay (2011). The Obligation to Resist Oppression. Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (1):21-45.
Margaret Crouch (2009). Sexual Harassment in Public Places. Social Philosophy Today 25:137-148.
Suzanne M. Uniacke (2005). Responsibility and Obligation: Some Kantian Directions. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (4):461 – 475.
Sylvia Burrow (2012). Reproductive Autonomy and Reproductive Technology. Techné 16 (1):31-45.
Scott Anderson (2013). On Sexual Obligation and Sexual Autonomy. Hypatia 28 (1):122-141.
Marilyn Friedman (1996). Women's Autonomy and Feminist Aspirations. Journal of Philosophical Research 21:331-340.
Thomas Pink (2007). Normativity and Reason. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):406-431.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #124,537 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?