Social Theory and Practice 35 (4):555-576 (2009)
|Abstract||A liberal antinomy of parenting exists: strong liberal intuitions militate in favor of both denying special resources to parenting projects (on grounds of project-neutrality) and granting them (on grounds of respect for personhood). I show that we can reconcile these two claims by rejecting a premise common to both--viz. that liberalism is necessarily committed to extensive procreative liberties--and limiting procreation and subsequent parenting to adults who meet certain psychological and especially financial criteria. I also defend this argument, which provides a Kantian complement to utilitarian arguments for restricting procreation, against a variety of objections.|
|Keywords||antinomy Immanuel Kant children neutrality procreation parental licensing John Stuart Mill|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ferdinand Schoeman (1985). Parental Discretion and Children's Rights: Background and Implications for Medical Decision-Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):45-62.
Gerald K. Harrison & Julia Tanner (2011). Better Not to Have Children. Think, 10(27), 113-121:113-121.
Matt Sensat Waldren (2013). Why Liberal Neutralists Should Accept Educational Neutrality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):71-83.
David Archard & David Benatar (eds.) (2010). Procreation and Parenthood: The Ethics of Bearing and Rearing Children. Oxford University Press.
Timothy Fowler (2010). The Problems of Liberal Neutrality in Upbringing. Res Publica 16 (4):367-381.
Michael C. Rhodes (2005). Logical Proof of Antinomy: A Trinitarian Interpretation of the Law of Identity. Theandros 2 (3).
Gordon Matheson (1959). The Antinomy of Designation. Philosophy of Science 26 (3):260-269.
Added to index2009-11-27
Total downloads112 ( #6,222 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)24 ( #5,306 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?