Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (2):1-20 (2007)
|Abstract||This essay explores the treatment of the relation between nature (phusis) and norm or convention (nomos) in Democritus and in certain Platonic dialogues. In his physical theory Democritus draws a sharp contrast between the real nature of things and their representation via human conventions, but in his political and ethical theory he maintains that moral conventions are grounded in the reality of human nature. Plato builds on that insight in the account of the nature of morality in the myth in the Protagoras. That provides material for a defense of morality against the attacks by Callicles in the Gorgias and Thrasymachus and Glaucon in the Republic, all of whom seek to use the nature-convention contrast to devalue morality.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
D. T. J. Bailey (2006). Review: Epistemology After Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle and Democritus. [REVIEW] Mind 115 (460):1151-1153.
Robert J. O'Connell (1997). Plato on the Human Paradox. Fordham University Press.
Robert Pasnau (2007). Democritus and Secondary Qualities. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (2):99-121.
Michael Nill (1985). Morality and Self-Interest in Protagoras, Antiphon, and Democritus. E.J. Brill.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #19,715 of 722,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,873 of 722,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?