David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 51 (2):109 - 139 (2006)
Two readings of the much-discussed περιτροπή argument of "Theaetetus" 170c-171c have dominated the literature. One I call "the relativity reading". On this reading, the argument fails by ignoratio elenchi because it "carelessly" omits "the qualifications 'true for so-and-so' which [Protagoras'] theory insists on" (Bostock 1988: 90). The other reading I call "the many-worlds interpretation". On this view, Plato's argument succeeds in showing that "Protagoras' position becomes utterly self-contradictory" because "he claims that everyone lives in his own relativistic world, yet at the same time he is forced by that very claim to admit that no one does" (Burnyeat 1976b: 48). I discuss and criticise both readings, and present a third, according to which the point of the argument is, very roughly, that Protagoras is committed to equating truth and truth-for, and so, further, to their intersubstitutability. This further commitment proves fatal to his argument
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Francisco J. Gonzalez (2007). Dialogue Discontinued. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):371-392.
A. Long (2004). Refutation and Relativism in "Theaetetus" 161-171. Phronesis 49 (1):24 - 40.
Francisco J. Gonzalez (2007). Dialogue Discontinued: Heidegger on a Few Pages of Plato's Theaetetus. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):371-392.
Mohan Matthen (1985). Perception, Relativism, and Truth: Reflections on Plato's Theaetetus 152–160. Dialogue 24 (01):33-.
T. D. J. Chappell (2004/2005). Reading Plato's Theaetetus. Hackett Pub. Co..
Luca Castagnoli (2004). Protagoras Refuted: How Clever is Socrates' "Most Clever" Argument at Theaetetus 171a–C?'. Topoi 23 (1):3-32.
Marina Berzins McCoy (2005). Reason and Dialectic in the Argument Against Protagoras in the Theaetetus. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (1):21-39.
T. Chappell (2006). Reading the Peritropē: Theaetetus 170c–171c. Phronesis 51:109-139.
Chappell (2006). Reading the Περιτρoπη: Theaetetus 170c-171c. Phronesis 51 (2):109-139.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #49,050 of 1,088,873 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #30,950 of 1,088,873 )
How can I increase my downloads?