David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):80-92 (2010)
This essay explores the future of the liberal arts by investigating the visions of the future assumed respectively in the institutions of specialized and general education. The core dichotomy is between the specialized, which is instrumentality useful for a closed future, against the general, which is inherently valuable for an open future. The author doubts that educators can prioritize, in a single pedagogy, both inspiring people to freedom (liberal education) and preparing people to fit into an economic or academic niche (professional education). This frames a critique of LEAP'S rationale for higher education, although the value of particular classroom practices therein is affirmed. With reference to Freire and Seery, the essay proposes that theory per se presents the best mode for teaching toward an open future. The value of such teaching would be "potential," neither usable nor exchangeable, instrumental nor inherent
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Joseph Poulshock (2011). Practical Critical Realism for Liberal Arts in Language Education. Journal of Critical Realism 10 (4):465-484.
Erik W. Schmidt (2010). How to Value the Liberal Arts for Their Own Sake Without Intrinsic Values. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):37-47.
Miguel Martinez-Saenz & Craig Hanks (2010). The Occlusion of Truth Seeking in a Fog of Marketing. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):93-104.
Ryan Topping (2012). Happiness and Wisdom: Augustine's Early Theology of Education. Catholic University of America Press.
Charles W. Harvey (2010). The Conservative Limits of Liberal Education. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):30-36.
Richard A. Smith & John R. Leach (2010). Liberal Arts Education and Brain Plasticity. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):119-130.
Peter J. Mehl (2010). Educating for Life. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):105-118.
David Carr (2009). Revisiting the Liberal and Vocational Dimensions of University Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 57 (1):1 - 17.
Daniel R. DeNicola (2012). Learning to Flourish: A Philosophical Exploration of Liberal Education. Continuum.
Karen Adkins (2010). Against (Simple) Efficiency. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):58-67.
Nigel Tubbs (2013). The Value of the Arts. Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (3):441-456.
Jim Shelton (2010). The Subversive Nature of Liberal Education. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):25-29.
Charles W. Harvey (1997). Liberal Indoctrination and the Problem of Community. Synthese 111 (1):15-30.
Darryl Reed (2004). Universities and the Promotion of Corporate Responsibility: Reinterpreting the Liberal Arts Tradition. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (1):3-41.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads9 ( #350,937 of 1,792,217 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #139,362 of 1,792,217 )
How can I increase my downloads?