David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):112-126 (2007)
Judith Jarvis Thomson concludes “A Defense of Abortion” with a discussion of samaritanism. Whereas her rights-based arguments demonstrate the moral permissibility of virtually all abortions, this new consideration of samaritanism provides grounds for morally objecting to certain abortions that are otherwise morally pemissible given strictly rights-based considerations. I argue, first, that this samaritanism constraint on the moral permissibility of abortion involves an appeal to virtue-theoretical considerations. I then show why this hybridization of rights-based considerations and virtue-theoretical considerations has advantages over responses to the moral status of abortion that are either exclusively rights-based, or else exclusively virtue-theoretical. I conclude by offering some thoughts on how to utilize this hybrid strategy outside of Thomson’s particular context, as well as why we might generally favor such a strategy in our moral reasoning.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mary Anne Warren (1989). The Moral Significance of Birth. Hypatia 4 (3):46 - 65.
Nancy Davis (1988). Rights and Moral Theory: A Critical Review of Judith Thomson's Rights, Restitution, and Risk:Rights, Restitution, and Risk. Judith Jarvis Thomson, William Parent. Ethics 98 (4):806-.
Elisabeth Porter (1994). Abortion Ethics: Rights and Responsibilities. Hypatia 9 (3):66 - 87.
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1990). The Realm of Rights. Harvard University Press.
M. B. E. Smith (1992). Review Essay / the Best Intuitionistic Theory Yet! Thomson on Rights. Criminal Justice Ethics 11 (2):85-97.
John Oberdiek (2004). Lost in Moral Space: On the Infringing/Violating Distinction and its Place in the Theory of Rights. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 23 (4):325 - 346.
Stephen Griffith (1985). How Not to Argue About Abortion. Philosophy Research Archives 11:347-354.
Paul A. Roth (1983). Personhood, Property Rights, and the Permissibility of Abortion. Law and Philosophy 2 (2):163 - 191.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #152,492 of 1,934,424 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #66,302 of 1,934,424 )
How can I increase my downloads?