The cosmopolitan ideal in enlightenment thought: Its form and function in the ideas of Franklin, Hume, and Voltaire, 1694-1790
Journal of the History of Philosophy 18 (4):479-480 (1980)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStephen Miller (2001). Three Deaths and Enlightenment Thought: Hume, Johnson, Marat. Associated University Presses.
James Baillie (2000). Hume on Morality. Routledge.
Voltaire (2011). A Pocket Philosophical Dictionary. Oxford University Press, USA.
Maurice William Cranston (1986). Philosophers and Pamphleteers: Political Theorists of the Enlightenment. Oxford University Press.
Alan Charles Kors (2001). Voltaire and the Triumph of the Enlightenment. The Teaching Co..
Voltaire (2000). Treatise on Tolerance. Cambridge University Press.
Almut & Paul Spalding (2011). Living in the Enlightenment : The Reimarus Household Accounts of 1728-1780. In Martin Mulsow (ed.), Between Philology and Radical Enlightenment: Hermann Samuel Reimarus (1694-1768). Brill.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,368 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
