David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (4):257-284 (2007)
The starting point for the contemporary debate about theories of health should be the holistic theory of Lennart Nordenfelt, claims George Khushf, not the refuted theory of Christopher Boorse. The present paper is an attempt to challenge Nordenfelt and to present an alternative theory to his and other theories, including Boorse’s. The main problems with Nordenfelt’s theory are that it is relativistic, that it leads to counter-intuitive results as to what goals can count as healthy, that it focuses on the wrong kind of abilities, that it makes measuring health extra difficult, and that it does not give us a sufficient account of health, at most a necessary one. The alternative theory proposed is two-dimensional. First, health is to have developed the abilities and dispositions that members of one’s culture typically develop, and be able to use them, in acceptable circumstances; and second, health is to experience positive moods and sensations, the kinds that have internal causes. The theory solves the problems attached to Nordenfelt’s theory by not being individual relativistic, by eliminating the goals in the definition, by giving an alternative interpretation of “ability,” by making health easier to measure, and by adding the dimension of well-being that, together with health as ability, not only gives us a necessary, but also a sufficient, account of health.
|Keywords||Ability basic ability environment goals health holistic theory suffering well-being|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A. Vilhelmsson, T. Svensson & A. Meeuwisse (2011). Mental Ill Health, Public Health and Medicalization. Public Health Ethics 4 (3):207-217.
Per-Anders Tengland (2012). Health and Morality: Two Conceptually Distinct Categories? [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 20 (1):66-83.
P. -A. Tengland (2012). Behavior Change or Empowerment: On the Ethics of Health-Promotion Strategies. [REVIEW] Public Health Ethics 5 (2):140-153.
Per-Anders Tengland (2010). Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: Logically Different Conceptions? [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 18 (4):323-341.
Per-Anders Tengland (2010). Health Promotion or Disease Prevention: A Real Difference for Public Health Practice? [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 18 (3):203-221.
Similar books and articles
Lennart Nordenfelt (2000). On the Place of Fuzzy Health in Medical Theory. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (5):639 – 649.
Lennart Nordenfelt (2011). Health and Welfare in Animals and Humans. Acta Biotheoretica 59 (2):139-152.
Lennart Nordenfelt (1993). Concepts of Health and Their Consequences for Health Care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (4):277-285.
Lennart Nordenfelt (2000). Towards a New Paradigm for Health Promotion. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (3):315-317.
Norman Daniels (2008). Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly. Cambridge University Press.
Lennart Nordenfelt (1998). On Medicine and Health Enhancement - Towards a Conceptual Framework. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 1 (1):5-12.
Lennart Nordenfelt (2001). On the Goals of Medicine, Health Enhancement and Social Welfare. Health Care Analysis 9 (1):15-23.
Steven D. Edwards (1998). Nordenfelt's Theory of Disability. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (1):89-100.
József Kovács (1998). The Concept of Health and Disease. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (1):31-39.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #85,234 of 1,100,083 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #24,087 of 1,100,083 )
How can I increase my downloads?