Cut for core logic

Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (3):450-479 (2012)
Abstract
The motivation for Core Logic is explained. Its system of proof is set out. It is then shown that, although the system has no Cut rule, its relation of deducibility obeys Cut with epistemic gain
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,768
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
David Nelson (1949). Constructible Falsity. Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (1):16-26.
Neil Tennant (1992). Autologic. Edinburgh University Press.

View all 11 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Carlo Cellucci (2000). Analytic Cut Trees. Logic Journal of the IGPL 8:733-750.
Marcelo Finger & Dov Gabbay (2006). Cut and Pay. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (3):195-218.
Gilles Dowek & Benjamin Werner (2003). Proof Normalization Modulo. Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (4):1289-1316.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-10-23

Total downloads

19 ( #87,403 of 1,098,981 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #175,054 of 1,098,981 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.