Cut for core logic

Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (3):450-479 (2012)
The motivation for Core Logic is explained. Its system of proof is set out. It is then shown that, although the system has no Cut rule, its relation of deducibility obeys Cut with epistemic gain.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1755020311000360
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,658
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
David Miller (2009). Out of Error: Further Essays on Critical Rationalism. In Zuzana Parusniková & R. S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper. Springer 417--423.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Neil Tennant (2014). Aristotle's Syllogistic and Core Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (2):120-147.
Neil Tennant (2015). Cut for Classical Core Logic. Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (2):236-256.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Carlo Cellucci (2000). Analytic Cut Trees. Logic Journal of the Igpl 8 (6):733-750.
Marcelo Finger & Dov Gabbay (2006). Cut and Pay. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (3):195-218.
Gilles Dowek & Benjamin Werner (2003). Proof Normalization Modulo. Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (4):1289-1316.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

30 ( #104,699 of 1,725,949 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #109,857 of 1,725,949 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.