Games some people would have all of us play: A critical study of J. Hintikka, The Principles of Mathematics Revisited
Philosophia Mathematica 6 (1):226-241 (1998)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesL. Nathan Oaklander (1981). Book Reviews and Critical Studies. [REVIEW] Philosophia 9 (3-4):445-453.
A. W. Moore (1999). Review of P. Mancosu, Ed., From Brouwer to Hilbert: The Debate on the Foundations of Mathematics in the 1920s. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 7 (1):126-128.
Zeev Levy (1981). Book Reviews and Critical Studies. [REVIEW] Philosophia 9 (3-4):375-377.
Alan H. Goldman (1981). Book Reviews and Critical Studies. [REVIEW] Philosophia 10 (1-2):35-41.
Charles E. M. Dunlop (1981). Book Reviews and Critical Studies. [REVIEW] Philosophia 9 (3-4):391-403.
J. M. Dieterle (2000). Critical Studies/Book Reviews. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (3):347-348.
Leonard S. Carrier (1981). Book Reviews and Critical Studies. [REVIEW] Philosophia 9 (3-4):379-389.
G. Schlesinger (1981). Book Reviews and Critical Studies. [REVIEW] Philosophia 9 (3-4):455-467.
Neil Tennant (2000). What is Naturalism in Mathematics, Really?: A Critical Study of P. Maddy, Naturalism in Mathematics. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 8 (3):316-338.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,556 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
