David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sergio Tenenbaum (ed.)
Oxford University Press (2010)
Most philosophers working in moral psychology and practical reason think that either the notion of "good" or the notion of "desire" have central roles to play in our understanding of intentional explanations and practical reasoning. However, philosophers disagree sharply over how we are supposed to understand the notions of "desire" and "good", how these notions relate, and whether both play a significant and independent role in practical reason. In particular, the "Guise of the Good" thesis - the view that desire (or perhaps intention, or intentional action) always aims at the good - has received renewed attention in the last twenty years. Can one have desire for things that the desirer does not perceive to be good in any, or form intentions to act in way that one does not deem to be good? Does the notion of good play any essential role in an account of deliberation or practical reason? Moreover, philosophers also disagree about the relevant notion of good. Is it a purely formal notion, or does it involve a substantive conception of the good? Is the primary notion, the notion of the good for a particular agent, or the notion of good simpliciter? Does the relevant notion of good make essential appeal to human nature, or would it in principle extend to all rational beings? While these questions are central in contemporary work in ethics, practical reason, and philosophy of action, they are not new; similar issues were discussed in the ancient period. This volume of essays aims to bring together "systematic" and more historically-oriented work on these issues.
|Keywords||Good and evil Practical reason Desire (Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$65.88 new (16% off) $69.02 used (12% off) $78.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1401.D46 2010|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
Jessica Moss, Aristotle's Non-Trivial, Non-Insane View That Everyone Always Desires Things Under the Guise of the Good.
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Avery Archer (forthcoming). Do Desires Provide Reasons? An Argument Against the Cognitivist Strategy. Philosophical Studies:1-17.
Similar books and articles
John Skorupski (2012). The Triplism of Practical Reason. Ratio 25 (2):127-147.
Peter Brian Barry (2007). Sergio Tenenbaum, Appearances of the Good: An Essay on the Nature of Practical Reason:Appearances of the Good: An Essay on the Nature of Practical Reason. Ethics 118 (1):181-184.
Sergio Tenenbaum (2009). Knowing the Good and Knowing What One is Doing. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (sup1):91-117.
Larry S. Temkin (2012). Rethinking the Good: Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical Reasoning. Oxford University Press.
Kieran Setiya (2010). Sympathy for the Devil. In Sergio Tenenbaum (ed.), Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good. Oxford University Press 82--110.
K. Bykvist (2012). Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good * Edited by Sergio Tenenbaum. Analysis 72 (1):200-202.
G. F. Schueler (1995). Desire: Its Role in Practical Reason and the Explanation of Action. MIT Press.
Philip Clark (2010). Aspects, Guises, Species and Knowing Something to Be Good. In Sergio Tenenbaum (ed.), Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good. Oxford University Press 234.
Sergio Tenenbaum (2007). Appearances of the Good: An Essay on the Nature of Practical Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-06-22
Total downloads39 ( #108,708 of 1,911,757 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #144,933 of 1,911,757 )
How can I increase my downloads?