David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6):607-616 (1995)
Health care policy in the Netherlands has long been guided by the values of solidarity and equality. As a result of several forces, particularly the scarcity of resources, the retreat of the Welfare State and the introduction of market forces in health care, both values are increasingly under strain. Next to solidarity and equality, freedom of choice and financial responsibility are playing an important role in Dutch health care. Consequently, there is a growing division in Dutch heaith care between two tiers, one basic tier giving access to a basic package of services and a luxury tier giving access to a higher quality of care and to services not included in the basic package. The main thesis of the article is that a two-tier system is morally justified on the condition that the basic tier is universally accessible and is based on the value of humanitarian solidarity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Hans Maarse & Ruud Ter Meulen (2006). Consumer Choice in Dutch Health Insurance After Reform. Health Care Analysis 14 (1):37-49.
A. Bergmark (2008). Market Reforms in Swedish Health Care: Normative Reorientation and Welfare State Sustainability. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (3):241-261.
Similar books and articles
Ruud H. J. Ter Meulen (1995). Limiting Solidarity in the Netherlands: A Two-Tier System on the Way. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6).
R. Ter Meulen & F. Jotterand (2008). Individual Responsibility and Solidarity in European Health Care: Further Down the Road to Two-Tier System of Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (3):191-197.
G. J. van der Wilt (1995). Towards a Two Tier Health System in the Netherlands: How to Put Theory Into Practice. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6):617-630.
Helen Keasberry (1992). Equity and Solidarity: The Context of Health Care in the Netherlands. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):463-477.
Barbara Prainsack & Alena Buyx (2012). Solidarity in Contemporary Bioethics – Towards a New Approach. Bioethics 26 (7):343-350.
Margo Trappenburg (2000). Lifestyle Solidarity in the Healthcare System. Health Care Analysis 8 (1):65-75.
H. T. Have & H. Keasberry (1992). Equity and Solidarity: The Context of Health Care in The Netherlands. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):463-477.
Qingyin Liang & Yun Xie (2011). How Critical is the Dialectical Tier? Argumentation 25 (2):229-242.
S. R. Premeaux (2005). Undergraduate Student Perceptions Regarding Cheating: Tier 1 Versus Tier 2 AACSB Accredited Business Schools. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (4):407 - 418.
Ruud ter Meulen & Katharine Wright (2012). Family Solidarity and Informal Care: The Case of Care for People with Dementia. Bioethics 26 (7):361-368.
Kees Schuyt (1998). The Sharing of Risks and the Risks of Sharing: Solidarity and Social Justice in the Welfare State. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (3):297-311.
David Couzens Hoy (1995). Skillful Solidarity. Inquiry 38 (1 & 2):65 – 74.
Søren Holm (1995). "Socialized Medicine", Resource Allocation and Two-Tiered Health Care – the Danish Experience. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6):631-637.
John D. Norton (2012). Approximation and Idealization: Why the Difference Matters. Philosophy of Science 79 (2):207-232.
Pan Wei (2009). Core Social Values in Contemporary Societies. Diogenes 56 (1):53-73.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-11-21
Total downloads1 ( #771,748 of 1,793,151 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,412 of 1,793,151 )
How can I increase my downloads?