David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoria 64 (1):84-98 (2008)
W.V. Quine has expressed a fairly conventional form of non-cognitivism in those of his writings that concern the status of moral judgments. For instance, in Quine (1981), he argues that ethics, as compared with science, is ‘methodologically infirm’. The reason is that while science is responsive to observation, and therefore ‘retains some title to a correspondence theory of truth’ (p. 63), ethics lacks such responsiveness. This in turn leads Quine to contrast moral judgments with judgments that make cognitive claims (i.e., judgments that are true or false). In Quine (1986), he argues that ‘[m]oral judgments differ [...] from cognitive ones in their relation to observation’ (p. 664).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Heikki J. Koskinen & Sami Pihlström (2006). Quine and Pragmatism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (3):309-346.
Benjamin Bayer (2010). Quine's Pragmatic Solution to Sceptical Doubts. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (2):177-204.
Roger F. Gibson (1986). Quine's Dilemma. Synthese 69 (1):27 - 39.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1990). Quine's Relativism. Ratio 3 (2):142-149.
John P. Burgess (2008). 3. Cats, Dogs, and so On. In Dean W. Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. 4--56.
G. Ebbs (2011). Carnap and Quine on Truth by Convention. Mind 120 (478):193-237.
Roger F. Gibson (1994). Quine and Davidson: Two Naturalized Epistemologists. Inquiry 37 (4):449 – 463.
Lars Bergström (1994). Quine's Truth. Inquiry 37 (4):421-435.
Lars Bergström (1994). Quine's Truth. Inquiry 37 (4):421 – 435.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #64,663 of 1,004,692 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,743 of 1,004,692 )
How can I increase my downloads?