David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In D. Canale G. Tuzet (ed.), The Rules of Inference. Inferentialism in Law and Philosophy, Egea, Milano. Egea (Pp. Pp. 29-44) (2009)
In this paper, making reference to Robert Brandom's philosophical proposal - and against the background of Brandom's debate with Jürgen Habermas - I shall endeavor, first, to define the relation between recognition and normativity and then between recognition and criticism; in the final part of the paper I shall suggest a perspective that approaches recognition in terms of capacities. On this basis I attempt to see the critical attitude as something that is founded more on individual potentials than on formal criteria and that is essentially connected with a power of redescription: a dialectical anthropology of recognition is thus the most promising base to account for that which substantiates our critical powers.
|Keywords||Recognition Criticism Normativity Pragmatism Habermas Brandom capacities|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Steven Hendley (2005). From the Second to the Third Person and Back Again. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:169-188.
Anandi Hattiangadi (2003). Making It Implicit: Brandom on Rule-Following. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):419-31.
James Swindal (2007). Can a Discursive Pragmatism Guarantee Objectivity?: Habermas and Brandom on the Correctness of Norms. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (1):113-126.
James Swindal (2003). Discourse, Reflection and Commitment. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2):147-161.
David Lauer (2009). Genuine Normativity, Expressive Bootstrapping, and Normative Phenomenalism. Etica and Politica / Ethics & Politics 11 (1):321-350.
Thomas Fossen (2012). Politicizing Brandom's Pragmatism: Normativity and the Agonal Character of Social Practice. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):371-395.
Italo Testa (2011). Social Space and the Ontology of Recognition. In Heikki Ikäheimo Arto Laitinen (ed.), Recognition and Social Ontology. Brill Books (Pp. 287-308)
Kevin Scharp (2003). Communication and Content: Circumstances and Consequences of the Habermas-Brandom Debate. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (1):43 – 61.
Frank Scalambrino, Tales of the Mighty Tautologists? Normative Funtionalism and the Pittsburgh School.
Italo Testa (2012). Reconstruction and Pragmatist Metaphysics. On Brandom’s Understanding of Rationality. Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 41 (1-3):175-201.
Eduardo Mendieta (2007). The Meaning of Being is the Being of Meaning: On Heidegger’s Social Pragmatism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (1):99-112.
Kenneth Baynes (2002). Freedom and Recognition in Hegel and Habermas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (1):1-17.
Italo Testa (2009). Second Nature and Recognition: Hegel and the Social Space. Critical Horizons 10 (3):341-370.
Piet Strydom (2006). Intersubjectivity – Interactionist or Discursive? Reflections on Habermas’ Critique of Brandom. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):155-172.
Gideon Rosen (2001). Brandom on Modality, Normativity, and Intentionality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):611-23.
Added to index2011-11-02
Total downloads48 ( #83,862 of 1,789,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #47,188 of 1,789,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?