Philosophy in the Contemporary World 18 (1):11-18 (2011)
|Abstract||The Wiki represents a legitimate form of literature that requires a deep rethinking of how texts are produced and consumed. In order to understand and evaluate the Wiki, Barthes' distinction between Text and Work, and the critique of authorship found in the writings of both Barthes and Foucault are employed. The Wiki is a genre of literature, which like Barthes' concept of the Text, is without identifiable authorship, and its production is directly related to semantic conventions governing the text as a system of signs. The authority of the Wiki is a function of its survival in an agonistic environment that extends from outright vandalism to reasoned discourse. Barthes concept of play, the pleasure of the text, the role of the reader, and Foucault's analysis of the hermeneutic function of authorship provide a theoretical basis for critiquing new forms of digital literature, which, like the Wiki, are disseminated across computer networks|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sean Burke (1998). The Death and Return of the Author: Criticism and Subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault and Derrida. Edinburgh University Press.
Hans Sluga (1985). Foucault, the Author, and the Discourse. Inquiry 28 (1-4):403 – 415.
Axel Cleeremans, Please Visit the NEW Wiki Website: Http://Grey.Colorado.Edu/CompCogNeuro/Index.Php/CECN.
Ugo Volli (2013). Who is the Author of Halakhah? International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):191-210.
Denisa Butnaru (2008). The Literary Text and the System of Relevances. Studia Phaenomenologica 8:83-108.
William Irwin (2004). Against Intertextuality. Philosophy and Literature 28 (2):227-242.
G. J. Dorleijn, Ralf Grüttemeier & Liesbeth Korthals Altes (eds.) (2010). Authorship Revisited: Conceptions of Authorship Around 1900 and 2000. Peeters.
Joost P. H. Drenth (1996). Proliferation of Authors on Research Reports in Medicine. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):469-480.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-18
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?