Ratio 21 (3):344-359 (2008)
|Abstract||Nelson Goodman and, following him, Catherine Z. Elgin and Keith Lehrer have claimed that sometimes a sample is a symbol that stands for the property it is a sample of. The relation between the sample and the property it stands for is called 'exemplification' (Goodman, Elgin) or 'exemplarisation' (Lehrer). Goodman and Lehrer argue that the notion of exemplification sheds light on central problems in aesthetics and the philosophy of mind. However, while there seems to be a phenomenon to be captured, Goodman's account of exemplification has several flaws. In this paper I will offer an alternative account of exemplification that is inspired by Grice's idea that one can communicate something by providing one's audience with intention-independent evidence and letting them draw the obvious conclusion for themselves. This explication of exemplification will solve the problems that arose for Goodman's theory in the spirit of his approach.1.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Noel Hendrickson (2006). Towards a More Plausible Exemplification Theory of Events. Philosophical Studies 129 (2):349 - 375.
Arnold Cusmariu (1978). Self-Relations. Southern Journal of Philosophy 16 (4):321-327.
Arnold Cusmariu (1980). Ryle's Paradox and the Concept of Exemplification. Grazer Philosophische Studien 10 (1):65-71.
Henning Jensen (1973). Exemplification in Nelson Goodman's Aesthetic Theory. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 32 (1):47-51.
Ingvar Johansson (2013). Scattered Exemplification and Many-Place Copulas. Axiomathes 23 (2):235-246.
Fred Wilson (2013). Exemplification, Then and Now. Axiomathes 23 (2):269-289.
Servaas de V. van der Berg (2012). Towards Defending a Semantic Theory of Expression in Art: Revisiting Goodman. South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):600-612.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #95,541 of 722,865 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,865 )
How can I increase my downloads?