David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 67 (1):29 - 45 (2007)
According to Horwich’s use theory of meaning, the meaning of a word W is engendered by the underived acceptance of certain sentences containing W. Horwich applies this theory to provide an account of semantic stipulation: Semantic stipulation proceeds by deciding to accept sentences containing an as yet meaningless word W. Thereby one brings it about that W gets an underived acceptance property. Since a word’s meaning is constituted by its (basic) underived acceptance property, this decision endows the word with a meaning. The use-theoretic account of semantic stipulation contrasts with the standard view that semantic stipulation proceeds by assigning the meaning (reference) to W that makes a certain set of sentences express true propositions. In this paper I will argue that the use-theoretic account does not work. I take Frege to have already made the crucial point: "a definition does not assert anything but lays down something ["etwas festsetzt"]” (Frege 1899, 36). A semantic stipulation for W cannot be the decision to accept a sentence containing W or be explained in terms of such an acceptance. Semantic stipulation constitutes a problem for Horwich's use theory of meaning, especially his basic notion of acceptance.
|Keywords||Use theory of meaning Semantic stipulation Naming Illocution Horwich Frege|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joseph Almog, John Perry, Howard K. Wettstein & David Kaplan (eds.) (1989). Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press, USA.
J. L. Austin (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press.
J. L. Austin (1979). Philosophical Papers. Oxford University Press.
Kent Bach & Robert M. Harnish (1992). How Performatives Really Work: A Reply to Searle. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (1):93 - 110.
Paul Artin Boghossian (1996). Analyticity Reconsidered. Noûs 30 (3):360-391.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Martin Kurthen (1999). Semantic Typing Via Neuronal Assemblies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):296-297.
Eric Swanson (2009). Review of Reflections on Meaning, by Paul Horwich. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 118 (1):131-134.
Anil Gupta (2003). Deflationism, the Problem of Representation, and Horwich's Use Theory of Meaning. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):654 - 666.
Anil Gupta (2003). Deflationism, the Problem of Representation, and Horwich's Use Theory of Meaning. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):654–666.
Daniel Whiting (2006). Between Primitivism and Naturalism: Brandom's Theory of Meaning. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 21 (3):3-22.
Christopher Gauker (2015). The Illusion of Semantic Reference. In Andrea Bianchi (ed.), On Reference. Oxford University Press. 11-39.
Nenad Smokrović (2002). Semantic Naturalism and Normativity. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):71-81.
H. G. Callaway (1988). Semantic Competence and Truth-Conditional Semantics. Erkenntnis 28 (1):3 - 27.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #53,256 of 1,696,600 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #144,274 of 1,696,600 )
How can I increase my downloads?