David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Education 4 (2):153-162 (2010)
My article aims to develop a relational, pluralistic political theory that moves beyond standard theories of liberal democracy, and to consider how such a theory translates into our public school settings. I use a narrative style argument to share stories that focus on homogeneity and diversity from my visit to a Japanese elementary school, as I consider, drawing on the work of Chantal Mouffe, the important role harmony and disagreement, and a tension between homogeneity and diversity, play in encouraging citizens to contribute to their school and their larger communities in a democracy-always-in-the-making. I argue that there is much we can learn from Japanese educational practices
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Chantal Mouffe (2002). The Democratic Paradox. Political Theory 30 (6):862-864.
Barbara Finkelstein, Joseph Jay Tobin, Anne E. Imamura & Md) International Center for the Study of Education Policy and Human Values Park (1991). Transcending Stereotypes Discovering Japanese Culture and Education.
Catherine C. Lewis (1996). Educating Hearts and Minds: Reflections on Japanese Pre-School and Elementary Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (1):113-116.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ruth Mateos de Cabo, Ricardo Gimeno & María J. Nieto (2012). Gender Diversity on European Banks' Boards of Directors. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (2):145-162.
Elisabeth Bouscaren & Michael C. Laskowski (1993). S-Homogeneity and Automorphism Groups. Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (4):1302-1322.
Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson (2000). Why Deliberative Democracy is Different. Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (01):161-.
José A. Ferrari (1991). On the Homogeneity of Space and Time in Special Relativity. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (1):169-171.
Erika Bourguignon (1973). Diversity and Homogeneity in World Societies. [New Haven, Conn.]Hraf Press.
James Giles (ed.) (2008). Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought. Palgrave Macmillan.
James Bohman (2006). Deliberative Democracy and the Epistemic Benefits of Diversity. Episteme 3 (3):175-191.
Iwao Taka & Wanda D. Foglia (1994). Ethical Aspects of “Japanese Leadership Style”. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (2):135 - 148.
Enzo Rossi (2008). Liberal Democracy and the Challenge of Ethical Diversity. Human Affairs 18 (1):10-22.
Barbara J. Thayer-Bacon (2006). Beyond Liberal Democracy: Dewey's Renascent Liberalism. Education and Culture 22 (2):19-30.
Added to index2010-07-27
Total downloads9 ( #246,136 of 1,725,443 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,739 of 1,725,443 )
How can I increase my downloads?