Graduate studies at Western
Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):301-315 (2005)
|Abstract||Recently, James Smith and Merold Westphal have sought to reconcile Christianity with Lyotard’s definition of the postmodern – “incredulitytowards metanarratives” – by claiming that Christianity is not a metanarrative in Lyotard’s sense. This paper argues that their understanding of theLyotardian metanarrative is too restrictive, and that the term specifically includes Christianity within its scope. Despite this, though, there is a meansby which Christianity and Lyotard can be brought closer together. That method is to understand Lyotard’s refusal of metanarratives as being tosome extent provisional. Combining this idea with Lyotard’s notion of the differend allows Christianity and Lyotardian postmodernism to be found, ifnot in agreement, at least to coexist|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tim Jordan (1995). The Philosophical Politics of Jean-Franqois Lyotard. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (3):267-285.
George Yancy (2002). Lyotard and Irigaray: Challenging the (White) Male Philosophical Metanarrative Voice. Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (4):563–580.
Georges de Schrijver (2010). The Political Ethics of Jean-François Lyotard and Jacques Derrida. Peeters.
R. Nola & G. Irzik (2003). Incredulity Towards Lyotard: A Critique of a Postmodernist Account of Science and Knowledge. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):391-421.
Frans Van Peperstraten (2009). Displacement or Composition? Lyotard and Nancy on the Trait D'union Between Judaism and Christianity. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (1):29 - 46.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,662 of 751,029 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,924 of 751,029 )
How can I increase my downloads?