Traces of good in plotinus's philosophy of nature: Ennead VI.7.1-14

Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2):161-180 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ennead VI.7, the thirty-eighth treatise in order of composition, opens with a sustained attack on the idea that the form and function of various animal organs are the result of divine forethought and deliberation. In the first three chapters of the treatise, Plotinus argues that no formulation of the notion of deliberation can be made consistent with the facts about the nature of the intelligible2 and its priority over the physical world. As has been noted in the past,3 Plotinus's arguments against the Platonic idea that teleological thinking is a genuine cause in the sphere of biology can also be taken, from the standpoint of his own philosophical principles, to be effective against an Aristotelian ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-04-17

Downloads
312 (#62,385)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Naly Thaler
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

Teleology and Nous in Plotinus’s Ennead 6.7.Bernardo Portilho Andrade - 2020 - Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 61 (147):609-632.
Avicenna on Animal Goods.Bethany Somma - 2021 - Journal of Islamic Ethics 5:1-34.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references