Die kontroverse um die intuitionistische logik vor ihrer axiomatisierung durch heyting im jahre 1930

History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (1):67-75 (1988)
Abstract
Brouwer's criticism of mathematical proofs making essential use of the tertium non datur had a surprisingly late response in logical circles. Among the diverse reactions in the mid 1920s and early 1930s, it is possible to delimit a coherent body of opinions on these questions: (1) whether Brouwer's denial of the tertium non datur meant only the abandonment of this classical law or, beyond that, the affirmation of its negation; (2) whether one or both of these alternatives were logically inconsistent; and (3) whether Brouwer's line of argument was forced to take resort to the very law it was designed to refute. The controversy centred around a series of articles by Marcel Barzin and Alfred Errera who fought against the intuitionistic critique, missed their victory because of conceptual confusions and fallacious reasoning, but emerged unconvinced from the debate in the late 1930s. The controversy is of interest to the historiography of formal logic since it stimulated the clarification not only of the concepts of formal validity, decidability, many-valued systems of logic and non-classical systems generally, but also of the distinction between object and meta-level, and between a formal system and its semantics. Most important, the debate, by putting pressure on the intuitionistic camp to make their ideas more precise, seems to have given the decisive motivation towards Heyting's answer to this demand by his axiomatization of intuitionistic logic in 1930
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,561
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Rolin Wavre (1926). Logique Formelle Et Logique Empiriste. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 33 (1):65 - 75.
Rolin Wavre (1926). Sur le Principe du Tiers Exclu. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 33 (3):425 - 430.

View all 6 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Frank Wolter (1998). On Logics with Coimplication. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (4):353-387.
Roger Schmit (1985). Allgemeinheit und Existenz. Grazer Philosophische Studien 23:59-78.
Daniel Dzierzgowski (1995). Models of Intuitionistic TT and N. Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (2):640-653.
Silvio Ghilardi (1999). Unification in Intuitionistic Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):859-880.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index

2010-09-02

Total downloads

1 ( #431,671 of 1,098,129 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #283,807 of 1,098,129 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.