'To Believe In This World, As It Is': Immanence and the Quest for Political Activism
Deleuze Studies 4 (supplement):28-45 (2010)
| Abstract | In What is Philosophy?, Deleuze and Guattari make the claim that ‘[i]t may be that believing in this world, in this life, becomes our most difficult task, or the task of a mode of existence still to be discovered on our plane of immanence today. This is the empiricist conversion.’ What are we to make of such a calling? The paper explicates why and in what sense this statement is of exemplary significance both for an appropriate understanding of Deleuze's political thought and for a most timely conceptualisation of politics in a world so clearly defined by immanence, and nothing but immanence. I argue that Deleuze's rigorously constructive approach to the world is not beyond politics, as some recent readings have declared (e.g. those of Badiou and Hallward). Rather, we have to appreciate that in Deleuze and Guattari's demand for a ‘belief in this world’ the political intersects with the dimension of the ethical in such a way that our understanding of both is transformed. Only after this ‘empiricist conversion’ can we truly think of a Deleuzian politics that does justice to a plane of immanence ‘immanent only to itself’. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMiguel de Beistegui (2005). The Vertigo of Immanence: Deleuze's Spinozism. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):77-100.
Dorothea Olkowski (2008). Deleuze and the Limits of Mathematical Time. Deleuze Studies 2 (1):1-17.
Gilles Deleuze (2001). Pure Immanence: Essays on a Life. Distributed by the Mit Press.
James Williams (2010). Immanence and Transcendence as Inseparable Processes: On the Relevance of Arguments From Whitehead to Deleuze Interpretation. Deleuze Studies 4 (1):94-106.
Simon Choat (2009). Deleuze, Marx and the Politicisation of Philosophy. Deleuze Studies 3 (suppl):8-27.
Vlastimil Zuska (2000). Towards a Cognitive Model of Genre. Theoria 15 (3):481-495.
Jack Reynolds & Jon Roffe (2006). Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty: Immanence, Univocity and Phenomenology. Journal of the British Society of Phenomenology 37 (3):228-51.
Ian J. Thompson (1993). The Consistency of Physical Law with Divine Immanence. Science and Christian Belief 5:19-36.
Daniel W. Smith (2007). Deleuze and Derrida, Immanence and Transcendence. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 11:123-130.
Thomas Nail (2008). Expression, Immanence and Constructivism: 'Spinozism' and Gilles Deleuze. Deleuze Studies 2 (2):201-219.
Rodrigo Nunes (2010). Politics in the Middle: For a Political Interpretation of the Dualisms in Deleuze and Guattari. Deleuze Studies 4 (supplement):104-126.
Keith Robinson (2003). Events of Difference. Epoché 8 (1):141-164.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-11-23Total downloads18 ( #67,622 of 549,546 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,546 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
