David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Compass 5 (5):385-397 (2010)
While almost all of Kant's contemporaries agreed that the Critique of Pure Reason effected a philosophically epochal change, there was far less consensus about what precisely Kant's new critical philosophy had brought about. In large part, this uncertainty was a result of a methodological crisis that Kant's work had sparked: the Critique had shown that traditional dogmatic metaphysics was suspect at best, but what new methods needed to be adopted in the wake of Kant's 'Copernican Revolution'? The Critique stood as the lighting rod at the center of a complicated and especially lively set of debates and disputes that erupted in Germany in the late 1780s and early 1790s: empiricists and rationalists, threatened by the 'all-destroying Kant', leapt to challenge the new critical system; skeptics attacked Kant's claims to have secured a sure footing for empirical knowledge; a few ambitious thinkers sought to complete the critical system by revealing a foundational first principle on which Kant's system could rest. All of these elements conspired to make the early stages in post-Kantian thought one of the richest, most vibrant – and most fascinating – periods in the history of philosophy. The present essay looks at the various figures of the move from Kant to Fichte, and presents some of the excellent new research on the era that has appeared in the last decade or so. The sequel takes up the period from Fichte to Hegel, with an eye toward understanding how Kantian critical philosophy gave way to Hegelian Absolute Idealism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Stephen L. Darwall (2006). The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Harvard University Press.
Henry E. Allison (2004). Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Yale University Press.
Immanuel Kant (2007/1991). Critique of Pure Reason. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 449-451.
Otfried Höffe (2010). Immanuel Kant. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 6 (417):217-220.
Robert B. Pippin (1989). Hegel's Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Allen W. Wood (1998). The Final Form of Kant's Practical Philosophy. Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (S1):1-20.
Peter Thielke (2010). Who's Who From Kant to Hegel II: Art and the Absolute. Philosophy Compass 5 (5):398-411.
Karl Ameriks (2000). Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Ty D. Camp, From the Schematic to the Symbolic: The Radical Possibilities of the Imagination in Kant's Third Critique.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2009). Does Kant’s Opus Postumum Anticipate Hegel’s Absolute Idealism? In E.-O. Onnasch (ed.), Kants Philosophie der Natur. Ihre Entwicklung bis zum Opus postumum und Nachwirkung. deGruyter
Sebastian Gardner (1999). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason. Routledge.
Avery Goldman (2002). The Metaphysics of Kantian Epistemology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:239-252.
Simon Lumsden (2003). Satisfying the Demands of Reason: Hegel's Conceptualization of Experience. Topoi 22 (1):41-53.
Robert Stern (1999). Going Beyond the Kantian Philosophy: On McDowell's Hegelian Critique of Kant. European Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):247–269.
Added to index2010-05-07
Total downloads56 ( #73,984 of 1,792,100 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,595 of 1,792,100 )
How can I increase my downloads?