David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This is part of a larger project that is motivated in part by linguistic considerations and by the philosophical literature in action theory and the logic of ability, but that is also meant to suggest ways in which planning formalisms could be modified to provide an account of the role of ability in planning and practical reasoning.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Franck Lihoreau (2008). Knowledge-How and Ability. Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):263-305.
Paul H. Benson (1987). Ordinary Ability and Free Action. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (June):307-335.
Alfred R. Mele (2003). Agents' Abilities. Noûs 37 (3):447–470.
Justin Capes (2012). Action, Responsibility and the Ability to Do Otherwise. Philosophical Studies 158 (1):1-15.
Mark Rowlands (2006). The Normativity of Action. Philosophical Psychology 19 (3):401-416.
David R. Olson (2007). Self-Ascription of Intention: Responsibility, Obligation and Self-Control. Synthese 159 (2):297 - 314.
Mark A. Brown (1992). Normal Bimodal Logics of Ability and Action. Studia Logica 51 (3-4):519 - 532.
Katarzyna Paprzycka (2002). Flickers of Freedom and Frankfurt-Style Cases in the Light of the New Incompatibilism of the Stit Theory. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:553-565.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #111,786 of 1,902,204 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #346,051 of 1,902,204 )
How can I increase my downloads?