David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):225-245 (2002)
This article traces the history of the Minnesota approach to moral judgement research. It is claimed that this history can be subdivided into four phases, each one associated with a different goal and theoretical consideration. Attention is also given to the issues motivating the different research goals as well as highlights of the outcomes of this work. It is concluded that the Minnesota approach has been a progressive force in the field, promoting change in both theory and measurement and also serving as a stabilising force by reaffirming Kohlberg's basic view that moral judgements are both cognitive and developmental
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kenneth Williams (2010). An Assessment of Moral and Character Education in Initial Entry Training (IET). Journal of Military Ethics 9 (1):41-56.
Similar books and articles
James R. Rest, Darcia Narvaez, Stephen J. Thoma & Muriel J. Bebeau (2000). A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach to Morality Research. Journal of Moral Education 29 (4):381-395.
Lawrence J. Walker (2002). The Model and the Measure: An Appraisal of the Minnesota Approach to Moral Development. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):353-367.
Sally I. Powers (1988). Moral Judgement Development Within the Family. Journal of Moral Education 17 (3):209-219.
Clark Power (1988). The Just Community Approach to Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 17 (3):195-208.
Helen Weinreich (1975). Kohlberg and Piaget: Aspects of Their Relationship in the Field of Moral Development. Journal of Moral Education 4 (3):201-213.
John Broughton (1978). The Cognitive‐Developmental Approach to Morality: A Reply to Kurtines and Greif. Journal of Moral Education 7 (2):81-96.
Lawrence J. Walker (1999). The Family Context for Moral Development. Journal of Moral Education 28 (3):261-264.
James S. Leming (1981). Curricular Effectiveness in Moral/Values Education: A Review of Research. [REVIEW] Journal of Moral Education 10 (3):147-164.
Gerhard Minnameier (2001). A New "Stairway to Moral Heaven"? A Systematic Reconstruction of Stages of Moral Thinking Based on a Piagetian "Logic" of Cognitive Development. Journal of Moral Education 30 (4):317-337.
Beverly Woodward & Dale Hammerschmidt (2003). Requiring Consent Vs. Waiving Consent for Medical Records Research: A Minnesota Law Vs. The U.S. (HIPAA) Privacy Rule. Health Care Analysis 11 (3):207-218.
Aaron S. Richmond * & Rhoda Cummings (2004). In Support of the Cognitive‐Developmental Approach to Moral Education: A Response to David Carr. Journal of Moral Education 33 (2):197-205.
Peter E. Langford (1991). The Assessment of Moral Autonomy Within a Multidimensional Approach to the Development of Moral Reasoning. Journal of Moral Education 20 (1):55-78.
Larry Nucci (2002). Goethe's Faust Revisited: Lessons From DIT Research. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):315-324.
Iordanis Kavathatzopoulos (1991). Kohlberg and Piaget: Differences and Similarities. Journal of Moral Education 20 (1):47-54.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-02
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?