A Rejoinder to Mori
Journal of the History of Ideas 65 (2):335-341 (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFrederick van Fleteren (2000). Nec Timeo Mori. Augustinian Studies 31 (1):129-131.
Maurizio Mori (1993). Genetic Selection and the Status of the Embryo. Bioethics 7 (2-3):141-148.
Gianluca Mori (2004). A Short Reply. Journal of the History of Ideas 65 (2):343-344.
W. M. Edwards (1954). Immemores Mori. The Classical Review 4 (01):9-10.
S. Mori (ed.) (2007). Proceedings of the Int'l Society for Psychophysics. Int'l Soc. For Psychophysics.
Robert Smith (1998). Memento Mori. Angelaki 3 (3):45 – 57.
Raymond Wilson (1984). A Rejoinder to the Danapur Rejoinder. British Journal of Educational Studies 32 (1):55 - 57.
Gianluca Mori (2004). Bayle, Saint-Evremond, and Fideism: A Reply to Thomas M. Lennon. Journal of the History of Ideas 65 (2):323-334.
Michael W. Hickson & Thomas M. Lennon (2009). The Real Significance of Bayle's Authorship of the Avis. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):191 – 205.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads2 ( #232,575 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
