Expressive limitations of naïve set theory in lp and minimally inconsistent lp

Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (2):341-350 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s1755020314000033

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Inconsistency: The coherence theorist’s nemesis?Mylan Engel - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 40 (1):113-130.
Minimally inconsistent LP.Graham Priest - 1991 - Studia Logica 50 (2):321 - 331.
Naive Moral Fictionalism.Thomas Johnson - manuscript
A model of tolerance.Elia Zardini - 2008 - Studia Logica 90 (3):337-368.
Curry's paradox.Jc Beall - manuscript
Relevant deduction and minimally inconsistent sets.Keith Lehrer - 1973 - Philosophia 3 (2-3):153-165.
Applying inconsistent mathematics.Mark Colyvan - unknown
Naïve set theory is innocent!A. Weir - 1998 - Mind 107 (428):763-798.
The expressive dimension.Christopher Potts - 2007 - Theoretical Linguistics 33 (2):165-198.
The Opacity of Truth.Elia Zardini - 2015 - Topoi 34 (1):37-54.
The narrowing acquisition path: From expressive small clauses to declaratives.Christopher Potts & Tom Roeper - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-05

Downloads
9 (#1,219,856)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Research on Set Theory Based on Paraconsistent Logic.Shi Jing - 2020 - International Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):43.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Multiple-conclusion lp and default classicality.Jc Beall - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (2):326-336.
Minimally inconsistent LP.Graham Priest - 1991 - Studia Logica 50 (2):321 - 331.
A note on naive set theory in ${\rm LP}$.Greg Restall - 1992 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33 (3):422-432.
Reassurance for the logic of paradox.Marcel Crabbé - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):479-485.

Add more references