David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):225-253 (2005)
This essay seeks to develop and illustrate an approach to comparison based on "ad hoc" frames. A frame is defined by a question, to which dif- ferent thinkers can be seen as offering complementary and/or competing responses. Pursuing a middle ground between universalist conceptions of comparison and particularist rejections of comparison, this approach brings various positions into dialogue in a manner that is not inherently totalizing. The article draws extensively on Hegel's philosophy of religion to articulate this approach to comparison and its presuppositions. The sec- ond section of the essay seeks to illustrate the value of this approach by using the question of how traditional practices are inherited to frame a comparison of Hegel on habit and the Confucian thinker Xunzi on ritual. This comparison functions principally to indicate the process of comparison and suggest the value of pursuing this comparison in greater depth
|Keywords||self Xunzi Hegel comparative ethics habit anthropology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Alasdair MacIntyre (1988). Whose Justice? Which Rationality? University of Notre Dame Press.
Emmanuel Levinas (1969). Totality and Infinity. Pittsburgh, Duquesne University Press.
Martha Craven Nussbaum & Amartya Kumar Sen (1999). The Quality of Life. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Emmanuel Levinas (1979). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Distribution for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Boston.
Citations of this work BETA
John Kelsay (2012). The Present State of the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics: An Update. Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (4):583-602.
Elizabeth M. Bucar, Grace Y. Kao & Irene Oh (2010). Sexing Comparative Ethics: Bringing Forth Feminist and Gendered Perspectives. Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (4):654-659.
Jung H. Lee (2013). The Rhetoric Of Context. Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (4):555-584.
Similar books and articles
David Sztybel (2006). Can the Treatment of Animals Be Compared to the Holocaust? Ethics and the Environment 11 (1):97-132.
Thomas A. Lewis, Jonathan Wyn Schofer, Aaron Stalnaker & Mark A. Berkson (2005). Anthropos and Ethics Categories of Inquiry and Procedures of Comparison. Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):177-185.
Estrid Sørensen (2011). Comment on Norm Friesen's. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 15 (3):206-208.
Ann E. Cudd (2005). Missionary Positions. Hypatia 20 (4):164-182.
Alberto Vanzo (2010). Kant, Skepticism, and the Comparison Argument. In Pablo Muchnick (ed.), Rethinking Kant, vol. 2. Cambridge Scholars Publishers
Andrew Turner (2012). 'Placebos' and the Logic of Placebo Comparison. Biology and Philosophy 27 (3):419-432.
Sam Glucksberg & Catrinel Haught (2006). On the Relation Between Metaphor and Simile: When Comparison Fails. Mind and Language 21 (3):360–378.
John Bendix & Randall Collins (1998). Comparison in the Work of Reinhard Bendix. Sociological Theory 16 (3):298-301.
Geraldine Coster (1957/1934). Yoga and Western Psychology: A Comparison. Oxford University Press.
Tarmo A. Pasto (1966). Berenson's Criteria and the Space-Frames of Braque and Picasso: A Comparison. British Journal of Aesthetics 6 (4):346-348.
Aaron Stalnaker (2005). Comparative Religious Ethics and the Problem of “Human Nature”. Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):187-224.
Baron Reed (2009). A New Argument for Skepticism. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):91 - 104.
Andrei Pleşu & James Christian Brown (2004). Alexandru Dragomir. Studia Phaenomenologica 4 (3-4):65-72.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads7 ( #401,220 of 1,789,835 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #423,018 of 1,789,835 )
How can I increase my downloads?