David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Education 19 (3):192-205 (1990)
Abstract This paper examines adolescent perceptions of filial piety mainly from a psychological perspective. An attempt is made to explain why Singapore youth appear to hold the principal tenets of filiality in such high regard while newer perceptions of filial piety are also emerging among them. In spite of an ever increasing presence of modernization in Singapore, its youth continue to respect one of the most cardinal of Chinese virtues namely filial piety. This respect however, is becoming more tentative as adolescents question and in some cases challenge the filial ethic on cultural and societal grounds. The first part of the paper examines the nature of filial piety and its durability; this is done with reference to China and other countries which have Chinese populations. The main part of the paper will focus on the author's research concerning adolescent perceptions of filial piety in Singapore. Some of the problems relating to social change and its influence on the acceptance of filial piety are treated. It is urged that a more balanced view needs to be taken about the future place of filial piety in a changing society, for the benefit of the individual, the family and those responsible for the moral education of its citizens
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Milton Rokeach (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York,Free Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Li Maosen, Monica J. Taylor & Yang Shaogang (2004). Editorial. Journal of Moral Education 33 (4):405-428.
Similar books and articles
Xianglong Zhang (2007). A Temporal Analysis of the Consciousness of Filial Piety. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):309-335.
Hagop Sarkissian (2010). Recent Approaches to Confucian Filial Morality. Philosophy Compass 5 (9):725-734.
Xie Huiyuan (2008). Confucianism's Influence on Buddhism. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 6:91-97.
Galia Patt-Shamir (2012). Filial Piety, Vital Power, and a Moral Sense of Immortality in Zhang Zai's Philosophy. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (2):223-239.
Charles Zola (2001). Geriatric Filial Piety. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (2):185-203.
Tim Connolly (2012). Friendship and Filial Piety: Relational Ethics in Aristotle and Early Confucianism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39 (1):71-88.
Charles M. Zola (2013). Prudential Elder Care. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):137-164.
Qingping Liu (2009). To become a filial son, a loyal subject, or a humane person?—On the confucian ideas about humanity. Asian Philosophy 19 (2):173 – 188.
Thomas Radice (2011). Manufacturing Mohism in the Mencius. Asian Philosophy 21 (2):139 - 152.
Hsieh Yu-wei (1959). Filial Piety and Chinese Society. Philosophy East and West 9 (1/2):56-57.
Zhongying Cheng (1988). On Confucian Filial Piety and Its Modernization: Duties, Rights, and Moral Conduct. Contemporary Chinese Thought 20 (2):48-88.
Gad C. Isay (2005). Qian Mu and the Modern Transformation of Filial Piety. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32 (3):441–454.
A. T. Nuyen (2004). The Contemporary Relevance of the Confucian Idea of Filial Piety. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 31 (4):433–450.
Guang Xing (2010). A Buddhist-Confucian Controversy on Filial Piety. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37 (2):248-260.
Guo Qiyong (2011). Filial Piety," "Three Years Mourning," and "Love. Contemporary Chinese Thought 42 (4):12-38.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads19 ( #196,940 of 1,907,520 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,819 of 1,907,520 )
How can I increase my downloads?