Is the Appeal to Ordinary Usage Ever Relevant in Philosophical Argument?

The Monist 48 (4):533-546 (1964)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,374
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Oswald Hanfling (1984). Scientific Realism and Ordinary Usage. Philosophical Investigations 7 (3):187-205.
Andrew Melnyk (1995). Physicalism, Ordinary Objects, and Identity. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:221-235.
Adam Leite (2005). Some Worries for Would-Be WAMmers. Grazer Philosophische Studien 69 (1):101-126.
P. L. Heath (1952). The Appeal to Ordinary Language. Philosophical Quarterly 2 (6):1-12.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index

2011-01-09

Total downloads

1 ( #424,306 of 1,096,875 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #273,368 of 1,096,875 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.