David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (S1):85-92 (2007)
Dan Zahavi raises doubts about the prospects for combining phenomenological and analytical approaches to the mind, based chiefly on the claim that phenomenology is a form of transcendental philosophy. I argue that there are two ways in which one might understand the claim that phenomenology is transcendental: (1) as the claim that the methods of phenomenology essentially involve addressing transcendental questions or making transcendental arguments, or (2) as the claim that phenomenology is committed to substantive theses of antirealism and the like, which are sometimes thought to follow from atranscendental approach. I argue that while (1) is appropriate, it in no way leads to conflicts with analytic work in philosophy of mind. Moreover, adopting this method and practicing phenomenology in no way commits us to claims of type (2) that might be thought to conflict with common assumptions in analytic philosophy of mind
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Sokolowski (2000). Transcendental Phenomenology. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:233-241.
Nam-In Lee (2000). Practical Intentionality and Transcendental Phenomenology as a Practical Philosophy. Husserl Studies 17 (1):49-63.
Dan Zahavi (2004). Phenomenology and the Project of Naturalization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):331-47.
Julia Jansen (2005). On the Development of Husserl's Transcendental Phenomenology of Imagination and its Use for Interdisciplinary Research. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (2):121-132.
Florian Forestier (2012). The Phenomenon and the Transcendental: Jean-Luc Marion, Marc Richir, and the Issue of Phenomenalization. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 45 (3):381-402.
John J. Drummond (2008). The Transcendental and the Psychological. Husserl Studies 24 (3):193-204.
Morten Overgaard (2004). On the Naturalizing of Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):365-79.
Paul Gorner (2002). Heidegger's Phenomenology as Transcendental Philosophy. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):17 – 33.
Dieter Lohmar (2005). On the Function of Weak Phantasmata in Perception: Phenomenological, Psychological and Neurological Clues for the Transcendental Function of Imagination in Perception. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (2):155-167.
William R. McKenna, Robert M. Harlan & Laurence E. Winters (eds.) (1981). Apriori and World: European Contributions to Husserlian Phenomenology. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Boston.
Alexander Schnell (2012). Speculative Foundations of Phenomenology. Continental Philosophy Review 45 (3):461-479.
Raymond J. Devettere (1973). Merleau-Ponty and the Husserlian Reductions. Philosophy Today 17 (4):297-308.
Dermot Moran (2007). Fink's Speculative Phenomenology: Between Constitution and Transcendence. Research in Phenomenology 37 (1):3-31.
Donn Welton (1983). The Origins of Meaning: A Critical Study of the Thresholds of Husserlian Phenomenology. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Boston.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads28 ( #52,587 of 1,088,681 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,681 )
How can I increase my downloads?