Language, games and the role of interpreters in psychiatric diagnosis: a Wittgensteinian thought experiment
Medical Humanities 35 (1):13-18 (2009)
|Abstract||British society is becoming increasingly culturally and linguistically diverse. This poses a major challenge to mental health services charged with the responsibility to work in ways that respect cultural and linguistic difference. In this paper we investigate the problems of interpretation in the diagnosis of depression using a thought experiment to demonstrate important features of language-games, an idea introduced by Ludwig Wittgenstein in his late work, Philosophical investigations. The thought experiment draws attention to the importance of culture and contexts in understanding the meaning of particular utterances. This has implications not only for how we understand the role of interpreters in clinical settings, and who might best be suited to function in such a role, but more generally it draws attention to the importance of involving members of black minority ethnic (BME) communities in working alongside mainstream mental health services. We conclude that the involvement of BME community development workers inside, alongside and outside statutory services can potentially improve the quality of care for people from BME communities who use these services|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Z. Sadler (2005). Values and Psychiatric Diagnosis. Oxford University Press.
T. Szasz (1994). Psychiatric Diagnosis, Psychiatric Power and Psychiatric Abuse. Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (3):135-138.
Sue V. Rosser (1992). Is There Androcentric Bias in Psychiatric Diagnosis? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (2):215-231.
William Gay (1996). Bourdieu and the Social Conditions of Wittgensteinian Language Games. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 11 (1):15-21.
Jennifer Radden (2010). The Virtuous Psychiatrist: Character Ethics in Psychiatric Practice. Oxford University Press.
Malcolm Parker (2010). Diagnosis, Power and Certainty: Response to Davis. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (3):291-297.
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (2003). Logic, Language Games and Ludics. Acta Analytica 18 (30/31):89-123.
W. J. (1996). The Evidential Significance of Thought Experiment in Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (2):233-250.
Adriano C. T. Rodrigues & Claudio E. M. Banzato (2009). A Logical-Pragmatic Perspective on Validity. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 2 (2):40-44.
Kazem Sadegh-Zadeh (1982). Foundations of Clinical Praxiology Part II: Categorical and Conjectural Diagnoses. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (1):101-114.
Ullin T. Place (1992). The Role of the Ethnomethodological Experiment in the Empirical Investigation of Social Norms and its Application to Conceptual Analysis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22 (4):461-474.
Lennard J. Davis (2010). The Bioethics of Diagnosis: A Biocultural Critique of Certainty. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (2):227-235.
Michael A. Bishop (1999). Why Thought Experiments Are Not Arguments. Philosophy of Science 66 (4):534-541.
Lisa Bortolotti & Heather Widdows (2011). The Right Not to Know: The Case of Psychiatric Disorders. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (11):673-676.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads2 ( #246,187 of 722,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?