David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 48 (185):288 - 292 (1973)
For a long time Hume's philosophical achievement was judged almost entirely by Book I of the Treatise . A major contribution of Kemp Smith's work on Hume was the insistence that the epistemological doctrines of Book I were essentially related to the ethical theory of Book III. Recent moral philosophy has found Book III to be of considerable intrinsic interest and relevance to current problems. It is now becoming apparent, however, that Hume's ethical theory is intimately bound up with the philosophy of mind in Book II. This new emphasis upon the significance of Book II for Hume's ethics derives from Dr Pall S. Árdal's book Passion and Value in Hume's Treatise . In view of Árdal's influence on continuing study in this field—witness the recent book by Philip Mercer—it becomes important to point out what I take to be a major error in one part of Árdal's analysis of the relationship between Hume's philosophy of mind and his moral theory
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James Baillie (2000). Hume on Morality. Routledge.
Patrick Gardiner (1968). Passion and Value in Hume's Treatise. By Páll S. Árdal. (Edinburgh University Press. 1966. Pp. 220. 45s.). Philosophy 43 (164):177-.
John Bricke (1996). Mind and Morality: An Examination of Hume's Moral Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Páll S. Árdal (1986). Language and Significance in Hume's Treatise. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (4):779 - 783.
Páll S. Ardal (1966). Passion and Value in Hume's Treatise. Edinburgh, Edinburgh U.P..
Páll S. Árdal (1964). Remarks Concerning the Account of the Nature of Moral Evaluation in Hume's "Treatise". Philosophy 39 (150):341 - 345.
Rachel Cohon (2010). Hume's Moral Sentiments As Motives. Hume Studies 36 (2):193-213.
Thomas K. Hearn (1976). General Rules and the Moral Sentiments in Hume's "Treatise". Review of Metaphysics 30 (1):57-72.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads5 ( #415,032 of 1,777,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,290 of 1,777,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?