|Abstract||The hypothesis, that injunctive and descriptive norms interact positively or synergistically to promote cooperation in social dilemmas, is tested in the context of a survey study focusing on environmentally responsible behaviour. Measurement error and strong and positive correlations between the two types of normative beliefs make it difficult to test the interaction hypothesis. By using structural equation modelling with residual centering, these problems are overcome and the interaction hypothesis is confirmed. The result is stable across three replications spanning a two-year period.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Gillian R. Wark & Dennis L. Krebs (2000). The Construction of Moral Dilemmas in Everyday Life. Journal of Moral Education 29 (1):5-21.
Ryan Burg (2009). Deliberative Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 88:665 - 683.
Richard Schuster (2003). Why Not Go All the Way. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):173-174.
S. O. Kimbrough (2011). On the Production and Ramification of Cooperation: The Cooperation Afforder with Framing Hypothesis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (1):111-136.
Shay Welch (2013). Transparent Trust and Oppression. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):45-64.
Mathias Spichtig & Christian Traxler, Social Norms and the Indirect Evolution of Conditional Cooperation.
Kai P. Spiekermann (2009). Sort Out Your Neighbourhood. Synthese 168 (2):273 - 294.
Cristina Bicchieri & Azi Lev-On (2007). Computer-Mediated Communication and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: An Experimental Analysis. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):139-168.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #180,324 of 556,773 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?