David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Technology 25 (1):87-103 (2012)
Though the term “commodification” is used broadly, a theory of the processes by which goods become exchangeable and in fact objects of monetized exchange reveals a key site for technological politics. Commodities are goods that are alienable, somewhat rival, generally with low exclusion costs, and that are often consumed in use. Technological advances can affect all of these traits for certain goods, effectively bringing about a process of commodification by technological means. However, in order to function with specific contexts, technologies are designed and manufactured according to technical standards, standards that in turn take on features of what David Grewal ( 2008 ) has called “network power.” As such, standard setting processes become the potential locus for political argument over the legitimacy of a commodification process. Theorists hoping to develop more democratic theories of technological governance should thus recognize the significance of standards and the role they play in either promoting or controlling social relations organized according to the norms of monetized exchange.
|Keywords||Technical standards Innovation Political economy Critical theory Networks Animals Environmental Ethics Philosophy of technology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter-Paul Verbeek (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Penn State University Press.
Philip Kitcher (2001). Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford University Press.
Don Ihde (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indiana University Press.
Paul B. Thompson (2010). The Agrarian Vision: Sustainability and Environmental Ethics. University Press of Kentucky.
Andrew Feenberg (2002). Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lawrence Busch & Kyle Whyte (2012). On the Peculiarity of Standards: A Reply to Thompson. Philosophy and Technology 25 (2):243-248.
Merle Jacob (2009). On Commodification and the Governance of Academic Research. Minerva 47 (4):391-405.
Paul Thompson (2007). Theorizing Technological and Institutional Change. Techne 11 (1):19-31.
Peter Fleissner (2006). Commodification, Information, Value and Profit. Poiesis and Praxis 4 (1):39-53.
Asle H. Kiran (2012). Technological Presence: Actuality and Potentiality in Subject Constitution. [REVIEW] Human Studies 35 (1):77-93.
Jeroen de Ridder (2006). The (Alleged) Inherent Normativity of Technological Explanations. Techne 10 (1):79-94.
Adrian Mackenzie (2005). Problematising the Technological: The Object as Event? Social Epistemology 19 (4):381 – 399.
Charles Cambridge (2001). Compassion Versus Competitiveness: An Industrial Relations Perspective on the Impact of Globalization on the Standards of Employee Relations Ethics in the United States. Ethics and Behavior 11 (1):87 – 103.
León Olive (1986). Representación Y Resistencia Al Cambio Científico. Theoria 1 (3):621-640.
Dayna Simpson, Damien Power & Robert Klassen (2012). When One Size Does Not Fit All: A Problem of Fit Rather Than Failure for Voluntary Management Standards. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 110 (1):85-95.
Alan J. Richardson (2008). Due Process and Standard-Setting: An Analysis of Due Process in Three Canadian Accounting and Auditing Standard-Setting Bodies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3):679 - 696.
Bryan R. Warnick (2004). Technological Metaphors and Moral Education: The Hacker Ethic and the Computational Experience. Studies in Philosophy and Education 23 (4):265-281.
Philip Brey (2008). The Technological Construction of Social Power. Social Epistemology 22 (1):71 – 95.
Asle H. Kiran & Peter-Paul Verbeek (2010). Trusting Our Selves to Technology. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):409-427.
Added to index2011-05-11
Total downloads30 ( #139,377 of 1,934,580 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #195,826 of 1,934,580 )
How can I increase my downloads?