The Borg or Borges?

In Owen Holland (ed.), Journal of Consciousness Studies. Imprint Academic 187-192 (2003)
It is a paradox of the work of Artificial Intelligence that in order to grant consciousness to machines, the engineers first labour to subtract it from humans, as they work to foist upon philosophers a caricature of consciousness in the digital switches of weights and gates in neural nets. As the caricature goes into public circulation with the help of the media, it becomes an acceptable counterfeit currency, and the humanistic philosopher of mind soon finds himself replaced by the robotics scientist. This atmospheric inversion from above to below, one in which a sky turns into the smog of a thickened air, happened once before in the world of knowledge, when Comtian positivism inspired a functionalist approach to the study of the sacred. The social scientists first said that in order to study the sacred, one had to study how it functioned in society; then having contributed to the growth of their own academic domain, they more confidently claimed that what humans worshipped with the sacred was, in fact, their own society. There simply was no such thing as God or the sacred, and so Schools of Divinity began to be eclipsed by the elevation of the new towers of the office buildings of the Social Sciences. Indeed, as I turn now away from my computer screen, I can see outside my window the William James Building of Social Relations competing for dominance of the skyline with the Victorian brick Gothic of Harvard's Memorial Hall. This clever move to eliminate the phenomenological reality of human consciousness as a prelude to the growth of a new robotics industry is a very successful scam, for it has helped enormously with the task of fund-raising for costly moon shots, such as the Japanese government's 'Fifth Generation Computer Project' which promised to create an autonomously thinking machine in the 1980s. No one seems to talk much anymore about the failure of this project, but the gurus of A.I. continue to prophesy - as Ray Kurzweil now does - that by 2030, humans will be surpassed by machines in cultural evolution
Keywords *Artificial Intelligence  *Consciousness States  Culture (Anthropological)  Neuropsychology
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,651
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Peter Farleigh (2007). The Ensemble and the Single Mind. In Antonio Chella & Riccardo Manzotti (eds.), Artificial Consciousness. Imprint Academic 256-276.
Andrea Lavazza (2007). Sense as a 'Translation' of Mental Contents. In Antonio Chella & Riccardo Manzotti (eds.), Artificial Consciousness. Imprint Academic 82-96.
Tom Ziemke (2007). What's Life Got to Do with It? In Antonio Chella & Riccardo Manzotti (eds.), Artificial Consciousness. Imprint Academic 48-66.
Riccardo Manzotti (2007). From Artificial Intelligence to Artificial Consciousness. In Antonio Chella & Riccardo Manzotti (eds.), Artificial Consciousness. Imprint Academic 174-190.
Vincenzo Tagliasco (2007). Artificial Consciousness: A Technological Discipline. In Antonio Chella & Riccardo Manzotti (eds.), Artificial Consciousness. Imprint Academic 12-23.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

32 ( #148,782 of 1,902,713 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #324,370 of 1,902,713 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.