David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Deleuze Studies 4 (supplement):46-63 (2010)
The paper explores the relation of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri's work to that of Deleuze and Guattari. The main focus is on Hardt and Negri's concept of ‘the common’ as developed in their most recent book Commonwealth. It is argued that the common can complement what Nicholas Thoburn terms the ‘minor’ characteristics of Deleuze's political thinking while also surpassing certain limitations posed by Hardt and Negri's own previous emphasis on ‘autonomy-in-production’. With reference to Marx's notion of real subsumption and early workerism's social-factory thesis, the discussion circles around showing how a distinction between capital and the common can provide a basis for what Alberto Toscano calls ‘antagonistic separation’ from capital in a more effective way than can the classical capital–labour distinction. To this end, it is demonstrated how the common might benefit from being understood in light of Deleuze and Guattari's conceptual apparatus, with reference primarily to the ‘body without organs’ of Anti-Oedipus. It is argued that the common as body without organs, now understood as constituting its own ‘social production’ separate from the BwO of capital, can provide a new basis for antagonistic separation from capital. Of fundamental importance is how the common potentially invents a novel regime of qualitative valorisation, distinct from capital's limitation to quantity and scarcity.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Timothy S. Murphy & Abdul-Karim Mustapha (eds.) (2005). Resistance in Practice: The Philosophy of Antonio Negri. Pluto Press.
Mario Sáenz (2007). Living Labor in Marx. Radical Philosophy Review 10 (1):1-31.
Christian Haines (2011). Corporeal Time. Angelaki 16 (2):103 - 126.
Joanne Savage & Satoshi Kanazawa (2004). Social Capital and the Human Psyche: Why is Social Life "Capital"? Sociological Theory 22 (3):504-524.
J. A. Towey (1999). Aristotle on the Sense Organs (Review). [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 119:192-193.
David Thomas (1978). Sociology and Common Sense. Inquiry 21 (1-4):1 – 32.
Sean Sayers (2007). The Concept of Labor: Marx and His Critics. Science and Society 71 (4):431 - 454.
Daniel Little (1986). Historical Materialism and Capital. Topoi 5 (2):187-196.
Michael De Medeiros (2010). Common Sense. Weigl Publishers.
Rick Dolphijn (2011). ''Man Is Ill Because He Is Badly Constructed'': Artaud, Klossowski and Deleuze in Search for the Earth Inside. Deleuze Studies 5 (1):18-34.
Christian Coons & Noah Levin (2011). The Dead Donor Rule, Voluntary Active Euthanasia, and Capital Punishment. Bioethics 25 (5):236-243.
Paresh Chattopadhyay (1998). Value and Exploitation: Marx's Problem and Skillman's Solution. Science and Society 62 (2):218 - 240.
Neha Khetrapal (2010). Achieving Common Grounds in Communication Via Interfaces: A Role of Spatial Frames for Reference. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 7 (3):189-195.
Added to index2010-11-23
Total downloads9 ( #126,592 of 1,004,686 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,743 of 1,004,686 )
How can I increase my downloads?