|Abstract||Philippa Foot’s Natural Goodness is among the most beautiful and moving works of moral philosophy yet produced in the analytic tradition. It is so much an integral whole that it will seem barbaric to do as I propose briefly to do, and put it to the scalpel. But Natural Goodness propounds a complex theory with many levels or strata, some of which even the author fails completely to distinguish. I will distinguish three strata, each depending logically on the one that comes before. I will call them respectively logical Footianism, local Footianism and substantive Footianism. My purpose in making these distinctions is simply to advance discussion: I believe that objections to Natural Goodness generally confuse these different dimensions of the doctrine, and that the author to some extent aids this confusion|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Scott Woodcock (2006). Philippa Foot's Virtue Ethics has an Achilles' Heel. Dialogue 45 (3):445-468.
Samantha Vice (2005). On the Tedium of the Good. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):459 - 476.
Neal Weiner (2002). Philippa Foot, Natural Goodness (Book Review). Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (4):567-572.
Christine M. Korsgaard (2011). Natural Goodness, Rightness, and the Intersubjectivity of Reason: Reply to Arroyo, Cummiskey, Moland, and Bird-Pollan. Metaphilosophy 42 (4):381-394.
Philippa Foot (2001). Natural Goodness. Oxford University Press.
Joseph Millum (2006). Natural Goodness and Natural Evil. Ratio 19 (2):199–213.
Mark Wynn (1999). Natural Theology In an Ecological Mode. Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):27-42.
Mark C. Murphy (2003). Philippa Foot, Natural Goodness:Natural Goodness. Ethics 113 (2):410-414.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads135 ( #4,242 of 722,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,023 of 722,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?