|Abstract||The problem of universals arises when philosophy attempts to give an account of the relationship mind and objects, between language and the world. How do words succeed in being about things? In this paper I show how the problem of universals arises out of a particular theory about the relationship of words to things and that when an alternative theory is accepted the notion of universal dissipates and is replaced by the concept of meaning. Meaning, however, has its own problems. In the end I conclude that there are no universals.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Sharples (2005). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Universals: Two Problematic Texts. Phronesis 50 (1):43-55.
R. W. Sharples (2005). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Universals: Two Problematic Texts. Phronesis 50 (1):43 - 55.
Riin Sirkel (2011). Alexander of Aphrodisias's Account of Universals and its Problems. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):297-314.
David M. Armstrong (1978). Universals and Scientific Realism: A Theory of Universals Vol. Ii. Cambridge University Press.
Theodore Sider (2006). Bare Particulars. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
Javier Kalhat (2008). Structural Universals and the Principle of Uniqueness of Composition. Grazer Philosophische Studien 76 (1):57-77.
Paweł Rojek (2008). Three Trope Theories. Axiomathes 18 (3):359-377.
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2000). What is the Problem of Universals? Mind 109 (434):255-273.
Charles Landesman (1971). The Problem of Universals. New York,Basic Books.
Avrum Stroll (1961). Meaning, Referring, and the Problem of Universals. Inquiry 4 (1-4):107 – 122.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #40,823 of 549,068 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,186 of 549,068 )
How can I increase my downloads?