The representation of the shoah in Maus: History as psychology

Res Publica 8 (2):123-139 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The contemporary tendency in United States culture to substitute a discourse of psychology for political and social analysis is especially evident in treatments of the Shoah. Drawing on postmodernist techniques, Art Spiegelman's“Holocaust commix”, Maus, dramatizes not historical reality but the effort of representing the memory of trauma. In the absence of symbolic authority, suffering from rivalry with his father and haunted by the real of the father's voice, the son becomes the subject of the narration. Like Maus, the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C. and the criticism of Dominick LaCapra focus on the psychological processes of the private individual

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Contemporary Significance of Confucianism.Tang Yijie & Yan Xin - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):477-501.
Narrative, drama, and emotion in instrumental music.Fred Everett Maus - 1997 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (3):293-303.
In the eyes of God: a study on the culture of suffering.Fernando Escalante Gonzalbo - 2006 - Austin: University of Texas Press, Teresa Lozano Long Institute of Latin American Studies.
The dynamic emergence of representation.Mark H. Bickhard - 2004 - In Hugh Clapin (ed.), Representation in Mind. Elsevier. pp. 71--90.
Discourse: Definitions and contradictions.Ian Parker - 1990 - Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):187 – 204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
47 (#316,329)

6 months
4 (#573,918)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references