In R. Jay Wallace, P. Pettit, S. Scheffler & M. Smith (eds.), Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Clarendon Press (2004)
|Abstract||This will be the best way of explaining ‘Paris is the lover of Helen’, that is, ‘Paris loves, and by that very fact [et eo ipso] Helen is loved’. Here, therefore, two propositions have been brought together and abbreviated as one. Or, ‘Paris is a lover, and by that very fact Helen is a loved one’.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Doron Avital (2008). The Standard Metre in Paris. Philosophical Investigations 31 (4):318-339.
Gregory Wheeler & Pedro Barahona (2012). Why the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever Cannot Be Solved in Less Than Three Questions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):493-503.
Xianzhong Huang (2007). Justice as a Virtue: An Analysis of Aristotle's Virtue of Justice. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):265-279.
E. J. Borowski (1978). Puzzle Cases: The Wrong Approach to Personal Identity. Metaphilosophy 9 (3-4):252-258.
Andreas Kemmerling (2007). "The Property of Being Red": On Frank Jackson's Opacity Puzzle and His New Theory of the Content of Colour Experience. Erkenntnis 66 (1-2):187 - 202.
Gabriel Uzquiano (2010). How to Solve the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever in Two Questions. Analysis 70 (1):39-44.
Dan López de Sa (2007). The Chief Supreme Court Justice: A Metaphysical Puzzle? (El Presidente Del Tribunal Supremo: ¿Un Problema Metafísico?). Crítica 39 (115):61 - 68.
Aviv Hoffmann (2003). A Puzzle About Truth and Singular Propositions. Mind 112 (448):635-651.
Brian Rabern & Landon Rabern (2008). A Simple Solution to the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever. [REVIEW] Analysis 68 (2):105-112.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads103 ( #5,768 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,093 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?