David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (1):54 - 65 (2005)
This article is concerned with the relationship between assessment information and teacher planning. In the UK, although planning used to be central to characterisations of formative assessment, the most recent government proclamations under the 'Assessment for Learning' banner offer no clear role for teachers making decisions about what to do based on assessment information. In this article, the reasons behind the shift will be examined. 'Contingent planning' will be proposed as a mechanism for using assessment information in a planning context.
|Keywords||assessment information formative assessment teacher planning|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Paul Black (1998). Testing: Friend or Foe? Theory and Practice of Assessment and Testing. British Journal of Educational Studies 46 (3):340-342.
D. Shorrocks-Taylor (2002). National Testing: Past, Present and Future. British Journal of Educational Studies 50 (2):279-281.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Maddalena Taras (2005). Assessment: Summative and Formative: Some Theoretical Reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (4):466 - 478.
Marta Cialdea Mayer, Carla Limongelli, Andrea Orlandini & Valentina Poggioni (2007). Linear Temporal Logic as an Executable Semantics for Planning Languages. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (1):63-89.
Bruce Bridgeman (2003). Grammar Originates in Action Planning, Not in Cognitive and Sensorimotor Visual Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):287-287.
Matthew R. Longo & Bennett I. Bertenthal (2004). Automaticity and Inhibition in Action Planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):44-45.
Peter E. Midford (1998). High-Level Social Learning in Apes: Imitation or Observation-Assisted Planning? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):698-699.
Chrisoula Andreou (2004). Instrumentally Rational Myopic Planning. Philosophical Papers 33 (2):133-145.
Valérie Gaveau & Michel Desmurget (2004). Do Movement Planning and Control Represent Independent Modules? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):35-36.
David A. Westwood & Melvyn A. Goodale (2001). Perception and Action Planning: Getting It Together. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):907-908.
Scott Glover (2004). Separate Visual Representations in the Planning and Control of Action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):3-24.
Barbara Crossouard & John Pryor (2012). How Theory Matters: Formative Assessment Theory and Practices and Their Different Relations to Education. [REVIEW] Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (3):251-263.
B. S. Hale & L. Hale (2010). Respecting Autonomy in Population Policy: An Argument for International Family Planning Programs. Public Health Ethics 3 (2):157-166.
Andreas Faludi (1998). Why in Planning the Myth of the Framework is Anything but That. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (3):381-399.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads7 ( #404,639 of 1,790,544 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #433,815 of 1,790,544 )
How can I increase my downloads?