A study of experiential technology and scientific technology, exemplified by Chinese and western medicine
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):298-315 (2011)
Experience and science, being the two sources of technology, have different focuses. In experiential technology, techniques and skills are emphasized while in scientific technology tool or equipment. Experiential technology is generally regarded as local knowledge, and scientific technology universal. Traditional Chinese medicine is an experiential technology. In contrast, Western medicine is set up as a scientific technology with great efforts. Through the comparison of these two medicines, this paper attempts to illustrate the difference between the two technologies and in turn, the difference between these two medicines by defining these two technologies. Finally, this paper further investigates the special values of Chinese medicine. Making use of the SSK theory, this paper deconstructs the idea of universality of science, and argues that, the universality is the feature that science pursues, but not what it already has. With more historical evidence, experiential technology is more stable, while scientific technology is less stable because it updates quickly, and often changes reversely.
|Keywords||experiential technology scientific technology traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) Western medicine skills tool instrument|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joseph Rouse (1987). Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Cornell University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bjørn Hofmann (2002). Technological Medicine and the Autonomy of Man. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):157-167.
Fredrik Svenaeus (2013). The Relevance of Heidegger's Philosophy of Technology for Biomedical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (1):1-15.
Bjørn Hofmann (2001). On the Value-Ladenness of Technology in Medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):335-345.
Pak-Hang Wong (2012). Dao, Harmony and Personhood: Towards a Confucian Ethics of Technology. Philosophy and Technology 25 (1):67-86.
Mieke Boon (2011). In Defense of Engineering Sciences. Techne 15 (1):49-71.
Val Dusek (2006). Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Oxfordblackwell Pub..
Bjørn Hofmann (2003). Technological Paternalism: On How Medicine has Reformed Ethics and How Technology Can Refine Moral Theory. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):343-352.
Whachul Son (2008). What Are We Experiencing? Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 48:65-73.
Tony Grajeda (2005). Disasterologies. Social Epistemology 19 (4):315 – 319.
Geoff Crocker (2012). A Managerial Philosophy of Technology: Technology and Humanity in Symbiosis. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ;Palgrave Macmillan.
Noah Efron (2011). Zionism and the Eros of Science and Technology. Zygon 46 (2):413-428.
Zbigniew Szawarski (1989). Dignity and Technology. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):243-249.
Added to index2011-05-22
Total downloads9 ( #363,659 of 1,906,957 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,378 of 1,906,957 )
How can I increase my downloads?