Science fans: A basic description and analysis of the emergence of a pseudoscience movement in china
Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Science fans (minjian kexue aihaozhe) are a special group devoted to so-called scientific activities outside of the science community. They are different from amateur scientists (or science amateur) (yeyu kexue aihaozhe) in the way that they do not have proper channels for communication with the scientific community. The populations of Science fans' numbers increased sharply in the early 1980's in China because of the social environment, the public perception of science at that time, the misunderstanding of scientific activities by mass media, and the paranoid tendencies of science fans themselves. Research upon science fans can address the problem they have caused and provide some advice on the development of science communication in China.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Weiqin Zeng & David Resnik (2010). Research Integrity in China: Problems and Prospects. Developing World Bioethics 10 (3):164-171.
Arjo Klamer & Hendrik P. Van Dalen (2002). Attention and the Art of Scientific Publishing. Journal of Economic Methodology 9 (3):289-315.
reviewed John Wettersten (2006). I. C. Jarvie: The Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper's Social View of Science 1935–1945,. Philosophy of Science 73 (1):108-121.
Xiaofei Tian & Tong Wu (2009). The Philosophy of Scientific Practice in Naturalist Thought: Its Approaches and Problems. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):589-603.
Li Jianhui & Hong Fan (2003). Science as Ideology: The Rejection and Reception of Sociobiology in China. Journal of the History of Biology 36 (3):567 - 578.
Dachun Liu & Yongmou Liu (2009). A Reflection on the Alternative Philosophy of Science. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):576-588.
Boyce Rensberger (2000). Why Scientists Should Cooperate with Journalists. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):549-552.
K. Brad Wray (2010). Kuhn's Constructionism. Perspectives on Science 18 (3):311-327.
Joseph D. Sneed (1989). Micro-Economic Models of Problem Choice in Basic Science. Erkenntnis 30 (1-2):207 - 224.
Massimo Pigliucci (2010). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk. University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #247,893 of 751,702 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?