Cultural differences and philosophical accounts of well-being
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In cross-cultural studies of well-being psychologists have shown ways in which well-being or its constituents are tailored by culture (Arrindell et. al. 1997, Diener and Diener 1995, Kitayama et. al. 2000, Oishi & Diener 2001, Oishi et. al. 1999). Some psychologists have taken the fact of cultural variance to imply that there is no universal notion of well-being (Ryan and Deci, 2001, Christopher 1999). Most philosophers, on the other hand, have assumed that there is a notion of well-being that has universal application. Given the facts about cultural variance, is this a mistake? What are the implications for philosophers of the existence of cultural differences in well-being? In answer to these questions I distinguish two different philosophical projects in the area of well-being. One of these projects seeks to provide a formal analysis of well-being. I argue that this project is not undermined by the kinds of cultural differences that have been discovered and that, therefore, there might be a universal notion of well-being. The other project seeks to provide a substantive account of well-being. Cultural differences are relevant here, but not always as directly relevant as one might have assumed. The main goal of this paper, then, is to argue that the implications of cultural differences for the philosophical project are limited and to clear the ground for a universal notion of well-being. In service of this main goal, the paper takes on three subsidiary tasks. First, I clarify the basic question or questions that philosophers are trying to answer when they talk about well-being. Second, I provide a..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jesse Prinz (2009). The Normativity Challenge: Cultural Psychology Provides the Real Threat to Virtue Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 13 (2-3):117 - 144.
Surendra Arjoon, Alvaro Turriago-Hoyos & Ulf Thoene (forthcoming). Virtuousness and the Common Good as a Conceptual Framework for Harmonizing the Goals of the Individual, Organizations, and the Economy. Journal of Business Ethics.
Jesse Prinz (2009). The Normativity Challenge: Cultural Psychology Provides the Real Threat to Virtue Ethics. Journal of Ethics 13 (2-3):117-144.
Similar books and articles
Liane Young & Rebecca Saxe (2011). Moral Universals and Individual Differences. Emotion Review 3 (3):323-324.
Arthur M. Diamond (1982). Stable Values and Variable Constraints; the Sources of Behavioral and Cultural Differences. Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):49 - 58.
Louis P. White & Melanie J. Rhodeback (1992). Ethical Dilemmas in Organization Development: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (9):663 - 670.
Stephen Mills (2001). The Idea of Different Folk Psychologies. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (4):501 – 519.
Don Dedrick (1998). Culture in Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):571-572.
Alistair M. Macleod (2008). Universal Human Rights and Cultural Diversity. Social Philosophy Today 24:13-26.
H. Odera Oruka (1990). Cultural Fundamentals in Philosophy. Philosophy and Theology 5 (1):19-37.
L. J. Kirmayer (2011). Multicultural Medicine and the Politics of Recognition. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):410-423.
Brian Huss (2004). Cultural Differences and the Law of Noncontradiction: Some Criteria for Further Research. Philosophical Psychology 17 (3):375 – 389.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #137,506 of 1,780,590 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?