David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):373 – 391 (2007)
In this paper I argue that the debate between subjective and objective theories of prudential value obscures the way in which elements of both are needed for a comprehensive theory of prudential value. I suggest that we characterize these two types of theory in terms of their different aims: procedural (or subjective) theories give an account of the necessary conditions for something to count as good for a person, while substantive (or objective) theories give an account of what is good for a person, given some set of necessary conditions. Characterizing the theories in this way allows us to see their mutual compatibility. To make this case, I assume that a theory of prudential value ought to be descriptively and normatively adequate. The criterion of descriptive adequacy requires that our theory explain the subject relativity of prudential value. I characterize subject relativity in terms of justifiability to subjects and I argue that certain procedural theories are well suited to meet this criterion. The criterion of normative adequacy requires that our theory be capable of guiding action and I argue that a certain kind of substantive theory is needed to meet this requirement.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard B. Brandt (1998). A Theory of the Good and the Right. Prometheus Books.
Allan Gibbard (1983). A Noncognitivistic Analysis of Rationality in Action. Social Theory and Practice 9 (2/3):199-221.
Hill Jr (1986). Darwall on Practical Reason:Impartial Reason. Stephen L. Darwall. Ethics 96 (3):604-.
Rosalind Hursthouse (1999/2001). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Corey Brettschneider (2006). The Value Theory of Democracy. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (3):259-278.
Jyl Gentzler (2004). Winner of The Philosophical Quarterly Essay Prize 2003: The Attractions and Delights of Goodness. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):353 - 367.
Michael Cholbi (2010). A Kantian Defense of Prudential Suicide. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (4):489-515.
By Jyl Gentzler (2004). The Attractions and Delights of Goodness. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):353–367.
Alan C. Love (2012). Formal and Material Theories in Philosophy of Science: A Methodological Interpretation. In. In Henk W. de Regt (ed.), Epsa Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. 175--185.
Emanuela Ceva (2008). Impure Procedural Justice and the Management of Conflicts About Values. Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):5-22.
Robert L. Causey (1974). Unified Theories and Unified Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974:3 - 13.
Richard Arneson (1999). Human Flourishing Versus Desire Satisfaction. Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (01):113-142.
Lawrence B. Solum (2004). Procedural Justice. Southern California Law Review 78:181.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads58 ( #27,335 of 1,102,965 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,832 of 1,102,965 )
How can I increase my downloads?