David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 27 (2):153-173 (2010)
This paper affirms the thesis that Kierkegaard can be properly and profitably read in light of the virtue tradition, broadly construed. I consider several objections to this thesis, including the idea that Kierkegaard largely opposes the culture of antiquity out of which the virtue tradition comes, that Kierkegaard’s emphasis on duty and the commanded nature of love is incompatible with genuine concerns of virtue ethics, and that Kierkegaard’s concept of faith is incompatible with a strong concern for the virtues. Then I offer two avenues for broadening our thinking about his ethical philosophy in light of the attention he pays to the virtues. First, I argue that we may beneficially read Kierkegaard alongside Jane Austen, as someone whose writings reflect both the Christian and Aristotelian traditions. Second, in terms of contemporary moral philosophy, I suggest that Kierkegaard be placed in conversation with “radical virtue ethics,” a category recently introduced by David Solomon
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ian Duckles (2006). A (Partial) Defense of MacIntyre's Reading of Kierkegaard. Idealistic Studies 36 (2):141-151.
Norman Lillegard (2002). Passion and Reason: Aristotelian Strategies in Kierkegaard's Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2):251 - 273.
Roe Fremstedal (2011). The Concept of the Highest Good in Kierkegaard and Kant. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):155-171.
Antony Aumann (2009). Kierkegaard's Case for the Irrelevance of Philosophy. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (2):221-248.
Ingmar Pörn (1984). Kierkegaard and the Study of the Self. Inquiry 27 (1-4):199 – 205.
Ingmar Pörn (1984). Kierkegaard and the Study of the Self. Inquiry 27 (1-4):199-205.
Patrick Goold (1987). Kierkegaard's Christian Imperative. Faith and Philosophy 4 (3):304-318.
Christopher A. P. Nelson (2006). Kierkegaard, Mysticism, and Jest: The Story of Little Ludvig. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 39 (4):435-464.
Anthony Rudd (2008). Kierkegaard on Patience and the Temporality of the Self: The Virtues of a Being in Time. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):491-509.
Brad Frazier (2004). Kierkegaard on the Problems of Pure Irony. Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (3):417 - 447.
Mark A. Tietjen (2012). Antitheory and Edification: Williams and Kierkegaard on Some Possibilities for Philosophy. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (4):471-486.
Patrick Goold (1990). Reading Kierkegaard. Faith and Philosophy 7 (3):304-315.
Christopher Hamilton (1998). Kierkegaard on Truth as Subjectivity: Christianity, Ethics and Asceticism. Religious Studies 34 (1):61-79.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads15 ( #241,100 of 1,906,940 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #277,703 of 1,906,940 )
How can I increase my downloads?