David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Science 13 (3-4):217-228 (2008)
Before beginning a paper on metaphysics, it is wise to acknowledge the paper’s own “metaphysical” assumptions. In what follows, we must bear in mind that the history of philosophy is as interpretively diverse as it is long. We will begin with the premise that Metaphysics is indeed a foundational science. We will posit that Aristotle’s corpus is unified; that is, that Aristotle can be read as a “systematic” philosopher. Moreover, we will assume that the history of philosophy is itself a unity. If we posit such, “philosophy” can be read as a comprehensible continuity: a certainly contestable position. We must bear in mind that similitude is decidedly not identity; however, similitude does imply a certain conceptual correlation, one which, when pressed, may yield interesting, if not unexpected, results. Thus, we will travel at lightning speed through what took a snail’s pace to develop, “mapping,” so to speak, the structure of the unmoved mover of Aristotle’s Metaphysics (1941) onto the traditional historical divisions of the history of philosophy. We will begin with Aristotle himself in the Ancient period, move to Averroes (the Ibn-Rushd of this paper) in the Medieval period, focus on Descartes and Spinoza as Modern thinkers and, finally, end in Heidegger and Sartre in Contemporary philosophy. This is philosophy with a capital “P,” which may or may not be the reader’s preferred position, let alone the writer’s. But, for our purposes here, it is, nonetheless, inevitable
|Keywords||Aristotle Averroes Descartes God Spinoza|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
René Descartes (1984). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Cambridge University Press.
Jean-Paul Sartre (1956). Being and Nothingness. Distributed by Random House.
Aristotle (1960). Metaphysics. Univ of Michigan Pr.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Henry Blumenthal & Julia Annas (eds.) (1991). Aristotle and the Later Tradition: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 1991. Clarendon Press.
Laura M. Castelli (2011). Metaphysics XII 7, 1072A27-B1: An Argument of Identity. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5):837-848.
Terence Irwin (1988). Aristotle's First Principles. Oxford University Press.
Mary Louise Gill (2005). Aristotle's. Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (3).
Nancy J. Holland (1999). Rethinking Ecology in the Western Philosophical Tradition: Heidegger and/on Aristotle. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 32 (4):409-420.
Averroës (2002). Averroës' Middle Commentary on Aristotle's De Anima: A Critical Edition of the Arabic Text. Brigham Young University Press.
Christopher Philip Long (2003). Totalizing Identities: The Ambiguous Legacy of Aristotle and Hegel After Auschwitz. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2):209-240.
S. Marc Cohen, Aristotle's Metaphysics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #113,033 of 1,911,323 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #251,182 of 1,911,323 )
How can I increase my downloads?