David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cancer-related electronic support groups (ESGs) may be regarded as a complement to face-to-face groups when the latter are available, and as an alternative when they are not. Advantages over face-to-face groups include an absence of barriers imposed by geographic location, opportunities for anonymity that permit sensitive issues to be discussed, and opportunities to find peers online. ESGs can be especially valuable as navigation aids for those trying to find a way through the healthcare system and as a guide to the cancer journey. Outcome indicators that could be used to evaluate the quality of ESGs as navigation aids need to be developed and tested. Conceptual models for the navigator role, such as the Facilitating Navigator Model, are appropriate for ESGs designed specifically for research purposes. A Shared or Tacit Model may be more appropriate for unmoderated ESGs. Both conceptual models raise issues in Internet research ethics that need to be address.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Cynthia Ryan (2004). “Am I Not a Woman?” The Rhetoric of Breast Cancer Stories in African American Women's Popular Periodicals. Journal of Medical Humanities 25 (2):129-150.
Rebecca Dresser (2011). Bioethics and Cancer: When the Professional Becomes Personal. Hastings Center Report 41 (6):14-18.
Jennifer Bell, Psychosocial Care and Patient Autonomy: A Feminist Argument in Support of a "Meaning-Making" Intervention.
Sarah Roberts, Rob Lawson & Jeremy Nicholls (2006). Generating Regional-Scale Improvements in SME Corporate Responsibility Performance: Lessons From Responsibility Northwest. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 67 (3):275 - 286.
David B. Resnik (2005). Using Electronic Discussion Boards to Teach Responsible Conduct of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):617-630.
Julie Robillard, Carole Federico, Kate Tairyan, Adrian Ivinson & Judy Illes (2011). Untapped Ethical Resources for Neurodegeneration Research. BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1):9-.
James J. Cappel & John C. Windsor (2000). Ethical Decision Making: A Comparison of Computer- Supported and Face-to-Face Group. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 28 (2):95 - 107.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #215,417 of 1,700,300 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #105,649 of 1,700,300 )
How can I increase my downloads?