Eschatological images of prophet and Priest in Edward Schillebeeckx's theology of suffering for others
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Heythrop Journal 43 (1):34–59 (2002)
Eschatological images of Jesus as found in Jewish and Christian texts constitute the foundation of Edward Schillebeeckx’s positive orientation to suffering for others. Jewish prototypes provided the early Christians with an understanding of Jesus’ suffering, death, and resurrection as the advent of the eschaton. The pre‐existing biblical figures, which early Jewish Christians appropriated in the aftermath of the devastating crucifixion, provided traditional categories through which the life and death of Jesus could be meaningfully interpreted. Jesus as the eschatological prophet‐martyr and Jesus as the suffering, eschatological high priest of the Epistle to the Hebrews are the most prominent and complex of the ancient figures. In Schillebeeckx’s analysis, each of the two composite titles ascribed to Jesus is an amplification of a prophetic or priestly prototype. The use of both models is predicted on Jesus’ compassionate and redemptive response to suffering – healing the sick, comforting the bereaved, giving hope to the oppressed, and proclaiming eschatological salvation.Schillebeeckx’s historical‐critical investigation of Jesus’ perception of his anticipated death, as revealed in the Last supper narrative, and his analysis of the meaning ascribed to the crucifixion in primitive Christianity establish the basis for a theology of redemptive suffering in the early church. Schillebeeckx has critically examined three pre‐New Testament interpretations applied to Jesus’ crucifixion: the death of the eschatological prophet‐martyr in the Deuteronomic tradition of the prophets whose proclamations were typically misjudged by Israel; the fulfilment of the divine scheme of salvation through the suffering of the ‘righteous one’, who is ultimately exonerated by God; and a vicarious, atoning sacrifice . The interpretative categories examined by Schillebeeckx with respect to the crucifixion are closely related to the biblical images upon which his theology of suffering is based
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jacob Meskin (1989). From Phenomenology to Liberation. Philosophy and Theology 4 (2):119-144.
Franz H. Mueller (1971). Social Ethics or "Political Theology"? Thought 46 (1):5-28.
Steven T. Ostovich (1994). Messianic History in Benjamin and Metz. Philosophy and Theology 8 (4):271-289.
John Marsden (2010). Humanity in the Mystery of God: The Theological Anthropology of Edward Schillebeeckx. By Jennifer Cooper. Heythrop Journal 51 (3):531-532.
Paul Crowley (1995). Rahner's Christian Pessimism. Philosophy and Theology 9 (1/2):151-176.
John Breen (2009). Priest, Prophet, and King. Journal of Catholic Social Thought 6 (2):353-395.
Katelis Viglas (2007). Edward Moore's Origen of Alexandria and St. Maximus the Confessor: An Analysis and Critical Evaluation of Their Eschatological Doctrines. [REVIEW] Philotheos. International Journal for Philosophy and Theology 7:496-497.
Daniel Speed Thompson (2003). Epistemological Frameworks in the Theology of Edward Schillebeeckx. Philosophy and Theology 15 (1):19-56.
Elizabeth K. Tillar (2001). The Influence of Social Critical Theory on Edward Schillebeeckx's Theology of Suffering for Others. Heythrop Journal 42 (2):148–172.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #133,752 of 1,410,206 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #155,456 of 1,410,206 )
How can I increase my downloads?